Abstract

The authors present the results of a study of a three-way international collaboration project among one Hungarian class and two classes from Michigan and Washington, respectively. This multifaceted study focused on business planning, web design, and accessibility with the aim of investigating the effect of accessibility instruction on the production of business plans and websites. The distinguishing feature of this study was its emphasis to orient the three student groups on disability and accessibility issues from the perspective of the critical social model of disability advanced by disability studies theorists. The researchers collected quantitative and qualitative pre/postproject survey data from their three classes. They combined this data with the text of student emails sent among the project teams and instructor notes about their teaching to arrive at conclusions about the effectiveness of the collaboration using a mixed-methods approach. The results from the data analyses revealed significant benefit of the client–provider relationships among the three classes and the accessibility instruction provided by the Washington class to the other two classes on the business plans and websites.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2021-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281620966990
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Communication Design Quarterly

References (70) · 14 in this index

  1. Abdo M. (2018). JAWS screen reader and Zoom Text screen magnification software now free…
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. The American Economic Review
  4. 10.2307/2527079
  5. Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for anti-discrimination legislation
Show all 70 →
  1. Biddle T. (2013, April 3). User testing for web accessibility . h…
  2. Technical Communication
  3. Contemporary ergonomics 2006: Proceedings of the international conference on contemporary ergonomics (CE2006), 4–6 April 2006, Cambridge, UK
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Coogan, T. & Cluley, R. (2017). Servicescapes, people, brands, and marketing management: Looking to the futur…
  6. Craparo R. M. (2007). Significance level. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measu…
  7. A concise introduction to mixed methods research
  8. 10.1370/afm.104
  9. 10.1177/147078530805000106
  10. Featherstone D. (2011). Five stages of accessibility . http://sim…
  11. 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
  12. Attitudes and disabled people
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in Ameri…
  15. Dis)embodied form: Issues of disabled women
  16. Gilbertson T. D., Machin C. H. (2012, April). Guidelines, icons and marketable skills: An accessibility evalu…
  17. 10.1080/01972240701323572
  18. Just ask: Integrating accessibility throughout design
  19. A web for everyone: Designing accessible user experiences
  20. Horton S., Sloan D. (2014). Accessibility in practice: A process-driven approach to accessibility. In P. Lang…
  21. Hunsinger R. P. (2011). Using global contexts to localize online content for international audiences. In K. S…
  22. 10.1177/1080569913493460
  23. 10.1080/10447310701771472
  24. The New York Times
  25. CASALC Review
  26. Mace, R. (1985). Universal design, barrier-free environments for everyone. Designers We…
  27. Technical Communication Quarterly
  28. 10.4324/9781315231501
  29. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  30. Miller W. L., Crabtree B. F. (2005). Clinical research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), …
  31. Pride against prejudice: A personal politics of disability
  32. 10.1086/689313
  33. Nielsen J. (2001, November 11). Beyond accessibility: Treating users with disabilities …
  34. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  35. 10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.002
  36. 10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
  37. 10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
  38. Communication Design Quarterly
  39. Communication Design Quarterly
  40. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  41. Oswal S. K., Hewett B. L. (2013). Accessibility challenges for visually impaired students and their online wr…
  42. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  43. Palmer Z. (2018). Enabling global citizenship in intercultural collaboration: Cosmopolitan potential in onlin…
  44. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  45. Parolia N., Jiang J. (2006, August). The role of horizontal coordination in performance…
  46. 10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00098-3
  47. Power C., Freire A., Petrie H., Swallow D. (2012). Guidelines are only half of the story: Accessibility probl…
  48. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All
  49. Technical Communication
  50. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.214
  51. Rello L., Kanvinde G., Baeza-Yates R. (2012, April). Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to impr…
  52. Sandnes, F. E. & Eika, E. (2017). Head-mounted augmented reality displays on the cheap: a DIY approach to ske…
  53. Design Sciences and Technology
  54. Schmidt K. (2008). Remarks on the complexity of cooperative work (2002). In K. Schmidt (Ed.), …
  55. Shakespeare T., Watson N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In S. N. Barnartt & B…
  56. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction
  57. Siteimprove. (2019). Democracy, digital accessibility, and EU member parliament website…
  58. Maximum accessibility: Making your web site more usable for everyone
  59. Computers and Composition
  60. 10.1145/947226.947227
    Interactions  
  61. Fundamental principles of disability
  62. Vanderheiden G. (2000, November). Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability. In …
  63. 10.7208/chicago/9780226312811.001.0001
  64. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  65. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication