Abstract

The authors present the results of a study of a three-way international collaboration project among one Hungarian class and two classes from Michigan and Washington, respectively. This multifaceted study focused on business planning, web design, and accessibility with the aim of investigating the effect of accessibility instruction on the production of business plans and websites. The distinguishing feature of this study was its emphasis to orient the three student groups on disability and accessibility issues from the perspective of the critical social model of disability advanced by disability studies theorists. The researchers collected quantitative and qualitative pre/postproject survey data from their three classes. They combined this data with the text of student emails sent among the project teams and instructor notes about their teaching to arrive at conclusions about the effectiveness of the collaboration using a mixed-methods approach. The results from the data analyses revealed significant benefit of the client–provider relationships among the three classes and the accessibility instruction provided by the Washington class to the other two classes on the business plans and websites.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2021-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281620966990
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/2527079
  2. 10.1177/2329490617748710
  3. Coogan, T. & Cluley, R. (2017). Servicescapes, people, brands, and marketing management: Looking to the futur…
  4. 10.1370/afm.104
  5. 10.1177/147078530805000106
  6. 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2004.840486
  8. Gilbertson T. D., Machin C. H. (2012, April). Guidelines, icons and marketable skills: An accessibility evalu…
  9. 10.1080/01972240701323572
  10. Horton S., Sloan D. (2014). Accessibility in practice: A process-driven approach to accessibility. In P. Lang…
  11. Hunsinger R. P. (2011). Using global contexts to localize online content for international audiences. In K. S…
  12. 10.1177/1080569913493460
  13. 10.1080/10447310701771472
  14. 10.4324/9781315231501
  15. 10.1086/689313
  16. 10.1177/2329490617748690
  17. 10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.002
  18. 10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
  19. 10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
  20. 10.1145/2524248.2524261
  21. 10.1145/2644448.2644452
  22. 10.1177/2329490618765434
  23. Oswal S. K., Hewett B. L. (2013). Accessibility challenges for visually impaired students and their online wr…
  24. Palmer Z. (2018). Enabling global citizenship in intercultural collaboration: Cosmopolitan potential in onlin…
  25. 10.1177/2329490618802418
  26. 10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00098-3
  27. Power C., Freire A., Petrie H., Swallow D. (2012). Guidelines are only half of the story: Accessibility probl…
  28. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.214
  29. Rello L., Kanvinde G., Baeza-Yates R. (2012, April). Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to impr…
  30. Sandnes, F. E. & Eika, E. (2017). Head-mounted augmented reality displays on the cheap: a DIY approach to ske…
  31. Schmidt K. (2008). Remarks on the complexity of cooperative work (2002). In K. Schmidt (Ed.), Cooperative wor…
  32. Shakespeare T., Watson N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In S. N. Barnartt & B…
  33. 10.1145/947226.947227
    Interactions  
  34. Vanderheiden G. (2000, November). Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability. In Pro…
  35. 10.7208/chicago/9780226312811.001.0001
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →