Participatory design: barriers and possibilities

Sushil K. Oswal University of Washington

Abstract

Scholars conducting analytical research in multimodal interaction design have not paid enough attention to the use of disabled participants in their work. In this column I argue that participatory action research with these users is overdue for the sake of building a culture of accessible designs. Working on a larger project on participatory design for a book, this commentary records my initial thoughts on how participation by disabled users needs to be central to the overall production cycle. I begin with the premise that each disabled user participates in this multimodal discourse from an entirely different vantage point shaped by their social, physical, and artistic experiences. It also emphasizes that each user interacts with multimodality differently depending upon the body they have, the adaptive technology they employ, and the uses they have for multimodality.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2014-05-01
DOI
10.1145/2644448.2644452
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  6. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  7. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (22)

  1. A. Méndez-Vilas, A. S Martín, J. A. Mesa González, & J
  2. Evers V. & Hillen H. (2007). Online redesign of a website's information architecture to improve accessibility…
  3. 10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00065-4
  4. 10.1023/A:1011145532042
  5. Johnson R. R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts…
Show all 22 →
  1. Kintsch W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Kintsc…
  2. Lazar J. (Ed.). (2007). Universal usability: Designing computer interfaces for diverse user populations. Chic…
  3. Merrill D. & Selker T. (n.d.). A vibrotactile system for feeling the depth of digital images. Massachusetts: …
  4. Miele J. A. (n.d.). Tactile map automated production (TMAP): Using GIS data to automatically generate raised-…
  5. 10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50081-9
  6. M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P
  7. 10.1080/026990596124250
  8. Norman D. A. (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books. Norman D. A. (1988) The Psycho…
  9. 10.1080/02674649266780141
  10. Oskarsson Ö. & Glass R. L. (1996). An ISO 9000 approach to building quality software (p. 126). Prentice Hall.…
  11. Repenning A. (2000). AgentSheets. Retrieved from: http://www.agentsheets.com Repenning A. (2000). AgentSheet…
  12. Schön D. A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York: Basi…
  13. Schuler D. & Namioka A. (Eds.). (1993) Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence…
  14. 10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444631
  15. 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.017
  16. 10.1145/234313.234397
  17. 10.1097/00006324-199104000-00013