Abstract

Using interactive digital maps is now common practice for most universities. Increasingly, more users are introduced to their academic workplaces through online content such as Google Street View and virtual tours. Students with disabilities depend on environmental information to navigate the barriers they face on campus. While most webmasters for postsecondary institutions in the United States know their legal obligations for accommodation in the delivery of web content, legal conformance does not necessarily reflect awareness for social or spatial considerations in the design of campus digital maps. This study discusses an accessibility audit and content analysis of these interactive maps.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490618802446
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (48) · 5 in this index

  1. AccessibilityOz. (n.d.a). Developer checklist. Retrieved from https://www.accessibilityoz.com/factsheets/inte…
  2. AccessibilityOz. (n.d.b). Impact on users. Retrieved from https://www.accessibilityoz.com/factsheets/interact…
  3. 10.1145/1805986.1806000
  4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
  5. Professional communication: The social perspective
Show all 48 →
  1. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.05.007
  2. 10.1145/2444800.2444802
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Carlson L. L. (n.d.). Higher ed accessibility lawsuits, complaints, and settlements. Retrieved from http://ww…
  5. 10.1353/aad.0.0064
  6. The Chronicle Survey of Undergraduate Admissions Officers. (2008, May 2). The Chronicle of Higher Education. …
  7. Colour Blind Awareness. (n.d.). What is colour blindness? Retrieved from http://www.colourblindawareness.org
  8. Dick W., Jewett T. (2009). Mapping Section 508 to WCAG 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.tomjewett.com/accessibi…
  9. Technical Communication
  10. 10.1145/2904092.2904099
  11. Edelberg E. (2018). Texas state web accessibility laws. Retrieved from https://www.3playmedia.com/2017/06/30/…
  12. Enamorado S. (2018). Countries that have adopted WCAG standards [map]. Retrieved from https://www.3playmedia.…
  13. 10.1080/10668926.2010.484772
  14. 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18646
  15. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
  16. 10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3871
  17. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.007
  18. A web for everyone: Designing accessible user experiences
  19. International Consultants for Education and Fairs. (2015). Virtual tours growing in popularity. Retrieved fro…
  20. Feminist, queer, crip
  21. Kane S. K., Jayant C., Wobbrock J. O., Ladner R. E. (2009). Freedom to roam: A study of mobile device adoptio…
  22. 10.1145/1243441.1243471
  23. 10.2190/RAAC9
  24. Lazarte M. (2012). W3C web content accessibility guidelines become ISO/IEC international standard. Retrieved …
  25. Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies
  26. 10.1177/0162643415618927
  27. 10.1109/ITNG.2011.149
  28. Communication Design Quarterly
  29. Communication Design Quarterly
  30. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  31. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701, sec. 794 (1973). Retrieved from https://dredf…
  32. Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. § 794d (1998).Retrieved from https://www.section508.…
  33. The mathematical theory of communication
  34. Web accessibility: Web standards and regulatory compliance
  35. University of Washington. (n.d.). Resolution agreements and lawsuits. Retrieved from http://www.washington.ed…
  36. University System of Georgia. (n.d.). Higher education, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 508. …
  37. U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (n.d.). Protecting students with disabilities: Frequen…
  38. W3C. (2008). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20
  39. W3C. (2014). Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology (WCAG-EM) 1.0. Retrieved from https://w…
  40. W3C. (2018). Tutorials. Retrieved from https://www.w3schools.com/
  41. Web Accessibility Initiative. (n.d.). Selecting web accessibility evaluation tools. Retrieved from https://ww…
  42. Yamagami A. (2018). Google Maps learns 39 new languages. Retrieved from https://www.blog.google/products/maps…
  43. Journal of Business and Technical Communication