Planning for Difference: Preparing Students to Create Flexible and Elaborated Team Charters that Can Adapt to Support Diverse Teams

Maria Feuer Vermont State Hospital ; Joanna Wolfe Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background:</b> A robust body of research supports the use of team charters to purposefully create a team culture with shared norms and expectations. However, student teams often treat this requirement as busywork and fail to invest the effort needed to create team charters that prepare the team to adapt for obstacles that they may encounter. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</b> Teams that do not engage in effective planning for their collaborations are likely to encounter a range of problems including slackers, domineering teammates, curtailed learning opportunities, and general exclusion from the project work—problems that are often exacerbated on diverse teams and that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</b> We created three online modules that help students uncover their own tacit expectations for teamwork, share and merge these expectations, and then construct a team charter and task schedules with their teammates. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods:</b> We used a quasiexperimental design comparing team charters from control and experimental groups to understand how our modules affected students’ charters at a university with a highly international population. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> Analyses revealed that control group charters tended to invoke universal team norms and assign punishments for failing to uphold those norms. By contrast, experimental group charters were more flexible, acknowledged competing priorities, evidenced greater planning, and articulated processes that could accommodate individual goals, values, and constraints. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions:</b> Charters created after the modules showed more accommodation of difference; however, more research needs to be done to determine whether the more flexible and elaborated charters improve team behaviors.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3228020
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/emr.2002.1022419
  2. 10.1080/10686967.2009.11918214
  3. 10.1037/a0013257
  4. 10.1037/gdn0000059
  5. 10.1037/apl0000229
  6. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916343
  7. 10.1080/08832323.2010.489588
  8. 10.2307/3069453
  9. 10.1080/03637751.2013.828155
  10. 10.5465/amd.2015.0129
  11. 10.1287/mnsc.2017.3001
  12. 10.2307/2667029
  13. 10.1177/0021886318800997
  14. 10.1037/a0034125
  15. 10.1080/01411920903191047
  16. 10.1177/1088868309359288
  17. 10.1177/0021943609340669
  18. 10.1080/14675980120087480
  19. 10.1080/08832323.2013.763753
  20. 10.1177/0021886314566075
  21. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020346