Teams That Innovate: The Language of Difference-Driven Inquiry at the Workplace

Abstract

Leveraging a team’s diverse perspectives can be a powerful way to foster team innovation. A common approach to leverage team differences involves tool-based approaches, including brainstorming, mind-mapping, and whiteboarding. However, the effective use of ideational tools as a means to innovation often assumes high levels of team cohesion and productivity—dynamics that may not be safe to assume, especially in teams with high levels of diversity. This study investigates how workplace teams at a Biotech company use discourse to innovate, and in doing so, instantiate a larger rhetorical practice known as difference-driven inquiry.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490620949864
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. College English
Also cites 39 works outside this index ↓
  1. Aggarwal I., Woolley A. W. (2019). Team creativity, cognition, and cognitive style diversity. Management Scie…
  2. 10.1177/0273475308322283
  3. Anderson N., Potočnik K., Zhou J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science …
  4. Baer M., Frese M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process…
  5. Bassett-Jones N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innov…
  6. Bradley B. H., Postlethwaite B. E., Klotz A. C., Hamdani M. R., Brown K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of t…
  7. Cady S. H., Valentine J. (1999). Team innovation and perceptions of consideration: What difference does diver…
  8. Chen W., Allen C., Jonassen D. (2018). Deeper learning in collaborative concept mapping: A mixed methods stud…
  9. Clifton J. (2016). Argument as dialogue across difference: Engaging youth in public literacies. Routledge. ht…
  10. Cross G. A., Sides C. H. (2017). Envisioning collaboration: Group verbal-visual composing in a system of crea…
  11. De Dreu C. K. W., West M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in…
  12. Edmondson A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarter…
  13. Flanagan J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358. https://doi.o…
  14. Flower L., Long E., Higgins L. (2000). Learning to rival: A literate practice for intercultural inquiry. Rout…
  15. Getchell K., Lentz P. (2018). Rhetorical theory and praxis in the business communication classroom. Routledge…
  16. 10.1177/1469787412467123
  17. Hawlina H., Gillespie A., Zittoun T. (2019). Difficult differences: A socio-cultural analysis of how diversit…
  18. Hoever I. J., van Knippenberg D., van Ginkel W. P., Barkema H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspect…
  19. Hülsheger U. R., Anderson N., Salgado J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehens…
  20. Khilji S. E., Mroczkowski T., Bernstein B. (2006). From invention to innovation: Toward developing an integra…
  21. Kostopoulos K. C., Bozionelos N. (2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, ta…
  22. Kuckartz U., Rädiker S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer. htt…
  23. Lam C. (2018). More than a feeling: Applying a data-driven framework in the technical and professional commun…
  24. Lee C. B., Hanham J., Leppink J. (2018). Instructional design principles for high-stakes problem-solving envi…
  25. Li C.R., Lin C.J., Tien Y.H., Chen C.M. (2017). A multilevel model of team cultural diversity and creativity:…
  26. Mamishev A. V., Williams S. D. (2011). Technical writing for teams: The STREAM tools handbook. Wiley-IEEE Pre…
  27. Möllering G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and su…
  28. 10.1109/TE.2007.901982
  29. Paulus P. B., Nijstad B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Pre…
  30. Rawlins J. D. (2018). Inventio through praxis: Connecting competencies with the canon. In Getchell K., Lentz …
  31. Saunders B., Sim J., Kingstone T., Baker S., Waterfield J., Bartlam B., Burroughs H., Jinks C. (2018). Satura…
  32. 10.7208/chicago/9780226237015.001.0001
  33. Stark E. M., Shaw J. D., Duffy M. K. (2007). Preference for group work, winning orientation, and social loafi…
  34. Suddaby R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-6…
  35. Tollefsen D. P. (2006). Group deliberation, social cohesion, and scientific teamwork: Is there room for disse…
  36. Walsh I., Holton J. A., Bailyn L., Fernandez W., Levina N., Glaser B. (2015). What grounded theory is . a cri…
  37. West M. A., Anderson N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), …
  38. Wolfe J., Powell E. (2014). Strategies for dealing with slacker and underperforming teammates in class projec…
  39. Young I. M. (1997). Difference as a resource for democratic communication. In Bohman J., Rehg W. (Eds.), Deli…
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →