Abstract

Effective undergraduate instruction requires accurate knowledge of professional communication practices and employer expectations, but ongoing contradictions between academic and professional expectations reflect historical, rhetorical, and pedagogical causes for inaccurate presumptions. Taking a customer service perspective, one business faculty revised its undergraduate goals in terms of empirically determined employer expectations. Interviewing professionals familiar with expectations of entry-level business graduates, the authors identified 10 communication activities, each comprising three to nine subtasks that constitute entry-level communication competencies. The results suggest a need to reconsider traditional curricular organization and instructional focus across the business curriculum to develop relevant skills across all business majors.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-06-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490619831279
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  6. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  7. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 44 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/108056999605900203
  2. 10.1177/105256299902300302
  3. 10.5465/amle.2013.0044
  4. 10.1080/03634520216531
  5. 10.1177/108056999806100406
  6. 10.1177/0893318905278536
  7. 10.1080/08832323.2011.576280
  8. 10.1080/10570318309374131
  9. 10.1080/03634520601173136
  10. 10.3200/CTCH.56.3.163-172
  11. 10.1080/03634520109379240
  12. 10.1080/03634520216513
  13. 10.1080/03634520500213165
  14. 10.1080/03634520500076711
  15. 10.1111/1467-8527.00156
  16. 10.1177/1080569912458966
  17. 10.1080/03634528009378426
  18. 10.1177/108056990106400412
  19. 10.1080/03634529309378929
  20. 10.1080/03634520216500
  21. 10.1177/002194369803500101
  22. 10.1080/08832323.2010.480992
  23. 10.1080/10510977809367973
  24. 10.1080/10510978309368152
  25. 10.1108/13527590310468033
  26. 10.1080/08832320109601301
  27. 10.1177/1080569912458965
  28. 10.1177/1080569906297923
  29. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.305
  30. 10.1177/0893318990003004004
  31. 10.1080/00405848009542903
  32. 10.1177/002224298504900403
  33. 10.1177/105256299301700405
  34. 10.1177/1080569912460400
  35. 10.1177/1080569909349524
  36. 10.1177/0021943605274749
  37. 10.1177/108056990106400202
  38. 10.1177/1080569912450312
  39. 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2005.tb00893.x
  40. 10.1080/08832329909598987
  41. 10.1177/108056990106400413
  42. 10.1177/002194360103800301
  43. 10.1353/jhe.2005.0038
  44. 10.5465/amr.2007.26585724
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →