The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects

Abstract

This study examines previously untested variables that influence social loafing in professional and technical communication group projects by determining the influence of communication quality and task cohesion on social loafing. A set-up factors model, which included group size, peer review, project scope, and method of team formation, was also tested for means of comparison. The results indicated the communication quality and task cohesion model significantly reduced social loafing, explaining 53% of the variance in social loafing. The model of set-up factors only explained about 4% of the variance. The article discusses instructional strategies that foster quality communication to reduce loafing.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2015-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490615596417
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 62 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0273475308322283
  2. 10.1177/105256299902300503
  3. 10.1177/027347539802000108
  4. 10.1037/h0058629
  5. 10.1177/0893318913492564
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  7. 10.2308/jis.2008.22.1.27
  8. 10.1080/08832320309598613
  9. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00232.x
  11. 10.1177/104649640003100104
  12. 10.5465/amle.2004.12436817
  13. 10.1177/014920639702300303
  14. 10.1177/1080569904265321
  15. 10.1177/1080569908325861
  16. 10.1177/0273475307302019
  17. 10.1177/104649640003100101
  18. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00135.x
  19. 10.2307/256478
  20. 10.1207/s15324834basp0902_6
  21. 10.1037/h0054490
  22. 10.1177/108056990206500102
  23. 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  24. 10.1177/1469787412467123
  25. 10.1177/0146167285114011
  26. 10.3200/JRLP.142.1.89-112
  27. 10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.179
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
  29. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819
  30. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.978
  31. 10.1177/0893318997112004
  32. 10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002
  33. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00273.x
  34. 10.1037/h0022386
  35. 10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
  36. 10.1177/1046496406294322
  37. 10.1080/02602930903429302
  38. 10.1177/1080569908321431
  39. 10.1177/105256299301700210
  40. 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
  41. 10.1177/0018726703056001450
  42. 10.1177/1046496498293006
  43. 10.1006/obhd.1998.2753
  44. 10.1037/h0046141
  45. 10.1080/01443410020016635
  46. 10.1109/TE.2007.901982
  47. 10.2307/2095951
  48. 10.1037/0021-9010.62.6.674
  49. 10.1080/13562517.2010.493346
  50. 10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.484
  51. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375
  52. 10.1177/1080569904270991
  53. 10.1007/BF02230973
  54. 10.1177/001872679104400706
  55. 10.1177/1059601106291130
  56. 10.1177/027347539001200208
  57. 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120
  58. 10.1177/108056990106400413
  59. 10.1177/1046496498294004
  60. 10.1177/027347539101300208
  61. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020346
  62. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.308
CrossRef global citation count: 42 View in citation network →