“Dude, that Sucks”: Examining Scrum’s Influence on Empathy in Student Teams

Erin Friess University of North Texas ; Chris Lam University of North Texas

Abstract

The role of empathy in student team collaborations in technical and professional communication has been understudied. In this mixed methods study, we assess how Scrum affects both student perceptions of empathy and student use of empathetic strategies. We found that students who used Scrum considered themselves to be no more empathetic than students who did not use Scrum. However, a discourse analysis revealed that students who used Scrum deployed significantly more empathetic strategies than students who did not use Scrum.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2021-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2020.1803413
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_21
  2. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00019
  3. 10.1177/0021943610369782
  4. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2590018
  5. 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2009.00482.x
  6. 10.1002/smr.523
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2019.2913238
  8. 10.4018/IJKM.2017070102
  9. 10.1109/IPCC.2007.4464058
  10. 10.1177/1080569908325860
  11. 10.1109/TPC.2019.2911461
  12. 10.1037/apl0000377
  13. 10.1145/1723028.1723101
  14. 10.1093/sw/56.2.141
  15. 10.1007/s10615-010-0305-2
  16. 10.1108/13527599610126247
  17. 10.1177/1469787409355867
  18. 10.1007/s10551-011-0951-5
  19. 10.24251/HICSS.2018.679
  20. 10.1109/HICSS.2014.579
  21. 10.5465/amr.1998.926625
  22. 10.1177/2329490616680360
  23. 10.5430/ijhe.v6n6p1
  24. 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.022
  25. 10.1177/2329490615596417
  26. 10.1109/TPC.2018.2870683
  27. 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.11.001
  28. 10.1007/978-3-319-16262-1
  29. 10.1109/TE.2007.901982
  30. 10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235794
  31. 10.1145/3068698.3068701
  32. 10.1177/0273475302250571
  33. 10.1080/87567555.2012.669425
  34. 10.1109/AGILE.2011.34
  35. 10.1080/08854726.2014.913876
  36. 10.1145/3282665.3282667
  37. 10.1177/1080569912450312
  38. 10.1177/1741143207084060
  39. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.09.005
  40. 10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080107
  41. 10.1080/00223890802484381
  42. 10.1080/19378629.2013.814136
  43. 10.1109/HICSS.2007.180
  44. 10.1109/47.946462
  45. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020346
  46. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04831.x
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →