Abstract

When students cowrite with others who have different levels of proficiency with the English language, they can experience unproductive conflict related to feedback avoidance. The author interviewed 20 professionals with experience cowriting across such different English proficiencies and found three strategies that can facilitate feedback and collaboration: calibrate genre and reader expectations, establish protocols for reviewing texts, and frame feedback as a learning opportunity. She suggests that these strategies can be a step toward helping students mitigate their anxieties about feedback and feel more empowered to engage with linguistically diverse peers.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651919892306
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 11 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.system.2015.12.002
  2. 10.1177/1362168814561902
  3. 10.1080/17475751003787346
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  5. 10.4135/9781452218403.n25
  6. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
  7. 10.1177/1080569908325861
  8. 10.4324/9781410604859
  9. 10.1177/1088868309359288
  10. 10.1080/01411920903191047
  11. 10.1002/hrm.20312
  12. 10.1080/14675980120087480
  13. 10.1111/0023-8333.81997008
    Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies  
  14. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.001
  15. 10.1002/9780470696712.ch7
  16. 10.2307/4140684
  17. 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →