Diagrams in Contracts: Fostering Understanding in Global Business Communication

Stefania Passera Aalto University ; Anne Kankaanranta Aalto University ; Leena Louhiala-Salminen

Abstract

Research problem: Business-to-business contracts are complex communication artifacts, often considered “legal stuff” and the exclusive domain of lawyers. However, many other stakeholders without a legal background are involved in the negotiation, drafting, approval, and implementation of contracts, and their contributions are essential for successful business relationships. How can we ensure that all stakeholders in the global business context-whatever their native language or professional background-easily and accurately understand contract documents? This study suggests that integrating diagrams in contracts can result in faster and more accurate comprehension, for both native and non-native speakers of English. Literature review: We focused on the following research topics: (1) ways to integrate text and visuals to create more effective instructions, since we conceptualize contracts as a type of business instructions; (2) cognitive load theory, as it may help explain why contracts are so hard to understand and why text-visuals integration may ameliorate their understandability; (3) cognitive styles, as individual differences may affect how individuals process verbal and visual information, thus allowing us to explore the limitations of our suggested approach; (4) the English lingua franca spoken by business professionals in international settings, their needs and challenges, and the fact that pragmatic approaches are needed to ensure successful communication. Methodology: We conducted an experiment with 122 contract experts from 24 countries. The research participants were asked to complete a series of comprehension tasks regarding a contract, which was provided in either a traditional, text-only version or in a version that included diagrams as complements to the text. In addition to measuring answering speed and accuracy, we asked the participants to provide information about their educational background, mother tongue, and perceived mental effort in task completion, and to complete an object-spatial imagery and verbal questionnaire to assess their cognitive style. Conclusions: We found that integrating diagrams into contracts supports faster and more accurate comprehension; unexpectedly, legal background and different cognitive styles do not interact with this main effect. We also discovered that both native and non-native speakers of English benefit from the presence of diagrams in terms of accuracy, but that this effect is particularly strong for non-native speakers. The implication of this study is that adding diagrams to contracts can help global communicators to understand such documents more quickly and accurately. The need for well-designed contracts may open new opportunities for professional writers and information designers. Future research may also go beyond experimental evaluations: by observing this new genre of contracts in vivo, it would be possible to shed light on how contract visualizations would be perceived and interpreted in a global communication environment.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2017-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2017.2656678
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (96) · 13 in this index

  1. 10.3758/BF03195337
  2. 10.1080/0144341970170101
  3. 10.1080/0144341970170102
  4. 10.1080/0144341910110301
  5. 10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00038-8
Show all 96 →
  1. 10.1108/13563280610713879
  2. Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension
    J Mental Imagery
  3. 10.1037/0022-0663.73.3.419
  4. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.021
  5. Illustrations in user manuals: Preference and effectiveness with Japanese and American readers
    Tech Commun
  6. 10.1108/00251740610715704
  7. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.021
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. Visuals in instruction
  10. A comparison of prose and algorithms for presenting complex instructions
  11. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  12. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  13. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  14. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  15. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  16. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
  17. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715
  18. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.49
  19. 10.1080/00220973.1992.9943875
  20. 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
  21. 10.1007/BF02300480
  22. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64
  23. 10.1017/CBO9781139164603
  24. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.902
  25. 10.4018/978-1-4666-0152-9
  26. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  27. 10.1002/acp.1473
  28. Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design
    ECTJ-Educ Commun Technol  
  29. Face it – Bad legal writing wastes money
    Michigan Bar Journal
  30. 10.2139/ssrn.2325683
  31. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  32. Strategic contracting: Examining the business-legal interface
    Proactive Law in a Business Environment
  33. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  34. Dump the dumb screen dumps
    Tech Commun
  35. Helping readers connect text and visuals in sequential procedural instruction: developing…
    Tech Commun
  36. Technical Communication Quarterly
  37. 10.1038/nrn1201
  38. Imagery and Verbal Processes
  39. Visualizing knowledge for organizational communication within and across cultures
  40. Flowcharts, swimlanes, and timelines– Alternatives to prose in communicating legal…
    J Bus Tech Commun
  41. The Volunteer Subject
  42. Multiple Regression Testing and Interpreting Interactions
  43. 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
  44. 10.1162/08989290051137585
  45. 10.1080/10790195.2007.10850200
  46. 10.1177/001872089303500412
  47. Design to read: Guidelines for people who do not read easily user experience mag.
    User Experience Magazine
  48. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.004
  49. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.006
  50. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01099
  51. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
  52. 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048
  53. 10.1207/s15326985ep2704_8
  54. Building plain language from the ground up, part IV – Layout and design principles…
  55. Plain Language and the Document Revolution
  56. 10.1037/h0037045
  57. The design of commercial conditions
    Jusletter IT
  58. 10.1109/IV.2011.35
  59. Next generation deal design—Comics and visual platforms for contracting
    Jusletter IT
  60. 10.1177/2055563616668893
  61. 10.1017/CBO9781139026703
  62. Promoting business success through contract visualization
    The Journal of Law Business & Ethics
  63. Culture and complexity through English as a lingua franca: Rethinking competences and ped…
    J Engl Lingua Franca  
  64. User-friendly contracting tools—A visual guide to facilitate public procurement co…
    Proc IACCM Acad Forum Integrating Law Contract Manage Proactive Preventive Strat Approaches
  65. 10.1017/S0261444811000115
  66. Textured agreements: Re-envisioning electronic consent
    Proc Symp Usable Privacy Secur
  67. The Phonology of English as an International Language
  68. 10.1109/IV.2012.69
  69. 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1994.tb00303.x
  70. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.1018
  71. Answering the critics of plain language
    Scribes Journal of Legal Writing
  72. Writing for dollars, writing to please
    Scribes Journal of Legal Writing
  73. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.06.004
  74. Next generation contracts: A paradigm shift
  75. 10.1177/0021943610377315
  76. Lifting the Fog of Legalese Essays on Plain Language
  77. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003
  78. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  79. 10.1023/A:1022193728205
  80. 10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00029-1
  81. 10.1007/978-3-319-20898-5_33
  82. Technical Communication Quarterly
  83. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  84. 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
  85. 10.1080/014492998119337
  86. Technical Communication Quarterly
  87. 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L
  88. 10.2307/357383
  89. 10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_17