The Use of Multimodal Resources by Technical Managers and Their Peers in Meetings Using English as the Business Lingua Franca

Tiina Räisänen

doi:10.1109/tpc.2020.2988759

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2020 Open Access

The Use of Multimodal Resources by Technical Managers and Their Peers in Meetings Using English as the Business Lingua Franca

Tiina Räisänen University of Oulu

Abstract

Background: Engineers increasingly work and advance their careers in international business settings. As technical managers, they need management and technical skills when working with different stakeholders with whom they may not share a common first language. Studies have revealed that informal oral communication skills are of prime importance for global engineers who face challenges in building shared meaning and formulating clear messages in meetings with non-native speakers of English. This article proposes that studying the use of multimodal resources (spoken language, gaze, gestures, and objects) in meetings can unpack how work tasks are accomplished in business through different communicative strategies. Literature review: This paper focuses on engineers' and technical managers' needs and challenges in professional and intercultural communication where English is used as a business lingua franca (BELF) in multimodal meetings. While multimodal conversation and discourse analytic studies highlight the dynamic nature of meeting interaction, previous technical and professional communication and BELF research on multimodality is limited. Research questions: 1. How do technical managers use multimodal resources to articulate their ideas in BELF meetings with their peers? 2. How does the use of multimodal resources contribute to the construction of shared meaning in explanatory, consensus-seeking, and solution-finding communication? Methodology: This study reports on two case studies and multimodal discourse analysis of video-recorded meetings among technical managers and their peers in four companies. The use of multimodal resources is analyzed in explanatory, consensus-seeking, and solution-finding communication. Results and conclusions: In BELF meetings, assemblages of spoken language, gestures, tools, whiteboard, and documents contribute to constructing shared meaning. This study has implications for global professional and engineering communication. Future research should further examine multimodality in BELF meetings.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2020-06-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2020.2988759
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Green
Topics: discourse analysis professional writing multimodality multilingual writers book reviews
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Varhelahti et al. (2021)

Diversity and Communication in Virtual Project Teams

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Zhang et al. (2021)

The Construction of Interpersonal Meanings in the <i>iPhone 1</i> Product Launc…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (8)

Passera et al. (2017)

Diagrams in Contracts: Fostering Understanding in Global Business Communication

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Brewer et al. (2016)

Better Communication = Better Teams: A Communication Exercise to Improve Team P…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Yu (2011)

Integrating Intercultural Communication into an Engineering Communication Servi…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Berndt et al. (2009)

Complementing Business Case Studies with Humanitarian Case Studies: A Means of …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Melton (2008)

Lost in Translation: Professional Communication Competencies in Global Training…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Show all 8 →

Starke-Meyerring (2005)

Meeting the Challenges of Globalization

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Freeman (2003)

The science of conversation: Training in dialogue for NNS in engineering

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Amant (1999)

When culture and rhetoric contrast: examining English as the international lang…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Also cites 48 works outside this index ↓

10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X

↗
10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

↗
10.7146/jookc.v3i1.23876

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511611834

↗
10.1145/274644.274692

↗
10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00208.x

↗
10.1515/jelf-2018-0013

↗
10.1515/9783110302028.1662

↗
10.1177/0149206315614372

↗
10.1177/0275074018785448

↗
10.1109/EMR.2015.2430412

↗
10.1177/0021943610377301

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511803932

↗
10.1080/03637759309376314

↗
10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.001

↗
10.1017/S004740451200005X

↗
10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00929.x

↗
10.1515/TEXT.2009.022

↗
10.1037/1061-4087.50.3.131

↗
10.1177/14661381030042003

↗
10.3102/0013189X013005020

↗
10.1017/S0261444815000129

↗
10.1515/text.2010.030

↗
10.1016/0167-5419(86)90021-9

↗
10.1080/03043790902752038

↗
10.4324/9780203379493

↗
10.1177/1461445607075346

↗
10.1177/089124100129023990

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511807572

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511620850

↗
10.1017/CBO9781107589735.013

↗
10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003

↗
10.1177/0021943610377303

↗
10.1504/EJIM.2020.10028833

↗
10.1017/S0261444811000115

↗
10.1016/j.esp.2009.04.002

↗
10.1177/0021943610377315

↗
10.1108/02621710910932070

↗
10.1080/03634520302457

↗
10.2190/TIRC7

↗
10.1111/weng.12301

↗
10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016

↗
10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009

↗
10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_2

↗
10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00100

↗
10.1080/14790718.2017.1315809

↗
10.1007/978-3-319-94851-5_9

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 33 View in citation network → Build reading path →

The Use of Multimodal Resources by Technical Managers and Their Peers in Meetings Using English as the Business Lingua Franca

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Cites in this index (8)

Related Articles