Comparing Language Use in the Writing of Developmental Generation 1.5, L1, and L2 Tertiary Students

Written Communication Apr 2014

Comparing Language Use in the Writing of Developmental Generation 1.5, L1, and L2 Tertiary Students

Stephen M. Doolan Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi

Abstract

Developmental composition courses serve a sizable and growing number of Generation 1.5 students, or long-term U.S. resident language learners, and it is believed that language challenges may be part of Generation 1.5 writers’ difficulty in controlling the academic register. The current study investigates possible similarities and differences between Generation 1.5 students ( n = 149) and two other student groups: mainstream first language (L1) writers ( n = 203) and more traditional second language (L2) writers ( n = 55), thus determining the extent to which language-use variables distinguish Generation 1.5 texts from those of their classmates. Results indicate significant differences between Generation 1.5 and L2 students on holistic writing quality, word errors, word class errors, verb errors, total identified errors, and spoken features of language. Generation 1.5 and L1 texts significantly differed on academic features of language. Implications are presented, suggesting that developmental Generation 1.5 writing may be more similar to L1 writing than has been previously reported.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2014-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088314526352
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

Doolan (2013)

Generation 1.5 Writing Compared to L1 and L2 Writing in First-Year Composition

Written Communication
Lunsford et al. (2008)

“Mistakes Are a Fact of Life”: A National Comparative Study

College Composition and Communication
CHENOWETH et al. (2001)

Fluency in Writing

Written Communication
Connor (1990)

Linguistic/Rhetorical Measures for International Persuasive Student Writing

Research in the Teaching of English

Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓

10.1017/CBO9780511621024

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511804489

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002

↗
10.3998/mpub.770334

↗
10.1177/0265532209340190

↗
10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.003

↗
Doolan S. M. (2011b). A comparison of Generation 1.5, L1, and L2 tertiary student writing (Unpublished doctor…

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001

↗
10.2307/3587446

↗
10.3998/mpub.263445

↗
10.3758/BF03195564

↗
10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9

↗
10.4324/9781410603371

↗
10.4324/9781410602848

↗
10.2307/3586337

↗
10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001

↗
10.1016/1060-3743(94)90018-3

↗
10.37514/JBW-J.2003.22.2.05

↗
Mikesell L. (2007)

10.5070/B5.36286

CATESOL Journal ↗
10.1111/0023-8333.31997003

↗
10.21832/9781853598500-012

↗
10.4324/9780203885697

↗
10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00232.x

↗
10.1093/applin/19.2.225

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network →