The Pragmatics of Memo Writing

Written Communication Apr 1988

RICHARD BEACH ; CHRIS M. ANSON

Abstract

This study examined developmental differences in adolescents' and adults' use of rhetorical strategies in memos written during a role-play session. Ninth graders, twelfth graders, college juniors, and adult graduate students chose 1 of 11 roles within the context of the role-play situation and exchanged memos persuading each other to adopt a position regarding a policy for off-campus lunch privileges. Five memos written by each of 11 randomly selected participants at each grade level were categorized by t-unit on the basis of a system of 17 rhetorical strategies. Analyses determined the relationship between grade level and memo length, rhetorical strategies (in each of four initial t-units), rhetorical focus, and participants' perceptions of their audiences' “power” before and after the session. Results show that college students and adults were more likely than younger participants to focus their memos on presenting their roles and establishing a relationship with their audience. The memos of younger participants were more likely to use “assertive” or “conditional” rhetorical strategies. Across all grade levels, however, writers were more likely to focus initial memos on establishing relationships and later memos on articulating their positions.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 1988-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088388005002003
Open Access: Closed
Topics: graduate education

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

LARSON (1996)

Patterns in Transition

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
ROZUMALSKI et al. (1995)

Effects of Case and Traditional Writing Assignments on Writing Products and Processes

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
ANSON et al. (1990)

Moving Beyond the Academic Community

Written Communication
BONK (1990)

A Synthesis of Social Cognition and Writing Research

Written Communication

Cites in this index (10)

PICHÉ et al. (1987)

Social Cognition and Writing

Written Communication
BRANDT (1986)

Toward an Understanding of Context in Composition

Written Communication
KROLL (1986)

Explaining How to Play a Game

Written Communication
(1986)

Social Cognitive Ability as a Predictor of the Quality of Expository and Persua…

Research in the Teaching of English
Rafoth (1985)

Audience Adaptation in the Essays of Proficient and Nonproficient Freshman Writers

Research in the Teaching of English

Show all 10 →

KROLL (1985)

Social-Cognitive Ability and Writing Performance

Written Communication
LaROCHE et al. (1985)

Rhetoric and Rational Enterprises

Written Communication
RUBIN (1984)

Social Cognition and Written Communication

Written Communication
Odell et al. (1982)

Writing in a Non- Academic Setting

Research in the Teaching of English
Rubin et al. (1979)

Development in Syntactic and Strategic Aspects of Audience Adaptation Skills in…

Research in the Teaching of English

Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓

10.1080/03637758209376090

↗
10.1080/00221325.1980.10534117

↗
10.1080/00461528209529252

↗
10.2307/1129122

↗
10.1080/03637757909376010

↗
10.2307/358092

↗
10.2307/358093

↗
10.2307/377789

↗
10.1177/016502547800100102

↗
10.2307/356369

↗
10.2307/358094

↗
10.2307/377157

↗
Levinson, S.

Pragmatics

↗
10.2307/1129172

↗
10.2307/356377

↗
Nystrand, M.

The structure of written communication

↗
10.1080/03637757909376009

↗
10.1086/266577

↗
Svensson, C.

The construction of poetic meaning: A cultural-developmental study of symbolic and non-sy…

↗
10.2307/356188

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →