Abstract

This article argues for a social perspective of the new technical communication service course, a conclusion supported by several premises: the technical communication profession wants and needs accountability, accountability is demonstrated by evaluation, assessment requires that we define literacy, evaluating technical communication literacy requires portfolio evaluation, portfolio assessment supports the social perspective of learning, and the social construction concepts imply teaching strategies. The argument proceeds from a case study that demonstrates reliability, stability, and validity in its technical communication service course assessment, tasks, and instructor community. This article demonstrates that portfolios can help us both conceptualize and evaluate the new technical communication service course.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
1999-06-01
DOI
10.1080/10572259909364666
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College English
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. Signs, Genres, and Communities in Technical Communication.
  2. 10.2307/375964
CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →