Abstract

Recent scholarship has demonstrated the need for criticality toward writing assessments that privilege standard language ideologies and correctness-based approaches. However, teachers continue to experience discrepancies between their intentions and actions, struggling to address both content and form in facilitative, constructive commentary. This study uses the activity theory framework of pedagogical tools, composed of conceptual and practical tools, to analyze through interviews and commented-on papers how two college composition graduate instructors responded to student writing. This study finds that while one teacher held and enacted consistent and congruent pedagogical tools grounded in sociocultural theories of writing development, the other experienced entrenched conflict between competing beliefs about evaluative and process-oriented purposes for teaching writing. These contrastive experiences illustrate how instructors’ development of pedagogical tools is mediated by interactions between their epistemological orientations and language ideologies, reinforcing the need to surface tacit beliefs about Standardized English and academic writing. This study concludes with recommendations for productive intervention in novice composition teachers’ development of response practices.

Journal
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
2024-05-01
DOI
10.58680/rte2024584353
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
Show all 11 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓
  1. Always at the bottom: Ideologies in assessment of emergent bilinguals
    Journal of Literacy Research  
  2. Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy
  3. Expanding the dialogue on culture as a critical component when assessing writing
    Assessing Writing  
  4. Treatment of error in second language student writing
  5. Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives
    TESOL Quarterly  
  6. From academic language to language architecture: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies i…
    Theory Into Practice  
  7. Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education
    Harvard Educational Review  
  8. Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learnin…
    American Journal of Education  
  9. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States
  10. The dominant school language narrative: Unpacking English teachers’ language ideologies
    Linguistic Society of America  
  11. Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teache…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  12. What about writing? A national exploratory study of writing instruction in teacher prepar…
    Literacy Research and Instruction  
  13. Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms
  14. Building hopeful secondary school writers through effective feedback strategies
    English Journal  
  15. “Starting with what is”: Exploring response and responsibility to student writing through…
    English Education  
  16. The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach
    Teachers College Record  
  17. Competing centers of gravity: A beginning English teacher’s socialization process within …
    English Education  
  18. Raciolinguistics, “mis-education,” and language arts teaching in the 21st century
    Language Arts Journal of Michigan  
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →