Negotiating Translingual Literacy: An Enactment

Abstract

This article argues that an understanding of writing as translingual requires a shift to a different orientation to literacy—i.e., from autonomous and situated to negotiated. Such an orientationtreats the text as co-constructed in time and space—with parity for readers and writers in shaping the meaning and form—and thus performed rather than preconstructed, making the multimodal and multisensory dimensions of the text fully functional. Going beyond the native/nonnative and monolingual/multilingual speaker binaries, this study demonstrates that both student groups can orient themselves to such literate practices in the context of suitable pedagogical affordances. Drawing from teacher research informed by an ethnographic perspective, the study identifies four types of negotiation strategies adopted by writers to code-mesh and readers to interpret texts: envoicing, recontextualization, interaction, and entextualization. Envoicing strategies set the conditions for negotiation, as it is a consideration of voice that motivates writers to decide the extent and nature of code-meshing; recontextualization strategies prepare the ground for negotiation; interactional strategies are adopted to co-construct meaning; and entextualization strategies reveal the temporal and spatial shaping of the text to facilitate and respond to these negotiations. The analysis points to the value of a dialogical pedagogy that can further develop the negotiation strategies students already bring to the classroom.

Journal
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
2013-08-01
DOI
10.58680/rte201324158
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (11)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. College English
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Written Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 207 View in citation network →