Examining Digital Literacy Practices on Social Network Sites

Amber Buck College of Staten Island

Abstract

Young adults represent the most avid users of social network sites, and they are also the most concerned with their online identity management, according the Pew Internet and American Life Project (Lenhart, Purcell, Smith, & Zickuhr, 2010; Madden, 2012). These practices represent important literate activity today, as individuals who are writing online learn to negotiate interfaces, user agreements, and personal data, as well as rhetorical situations. Examining the social, technological, and structural factors that influence digital literacy practices in online environments is crucial to understanding the impact of these sites on writing practices. Applying Brooke’s (2009) concept of an “ecology of practice” to writing in digital environments, this article examines the digital literacy practices of one undergraduate student through his self-presentation strategies. In considering the roles that social network sites play in individuals’ literacy and identity practices, writing researchers and educators can better understand the literacy practices that students engage in outside of the classroom and the experiences they bring to their academic writing.

Journal
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
2012-08-01
DOI
10.58680/rte201220670
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (21)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 21 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Computers and Composition
  6. Computers and Composition
  7. Computers and Composition
  8. Computers and Composition
  9. Written Communication
  10. Computers and Composition
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Computers and Composition
  13. Computers and Composition
  14. Computers and Composition
  15. Computers and Composition
  16. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 69 View in citation network →