Abstract

The concept of a public—a group of strangers drawn together through their mutual attention to a text—has historically been tied to the notion of human intentionality. The recent popularization of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (such as ChatGPT) destabilizes this connection. When large language models generate text, they may inadvertently form stochastic publics—groups pulled together through the randomization of biased data patterns drawn from AI training material. This exploratory study draws on a three-phase dialogue with OpenAI's ChatGPT 4 to identify the risks of stochastic publics and suggest human-originated interventions grounded in feminist care ethics.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
10.1177/10506519241280592
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 12 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1145/3442188.3445922
  2. 10.7330/9781607328063
  3. 10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48
  4. 10.1177/23294906221074311
  5. 10.4159/9780674037618
  6. 10.7330/9781646423569
  7. 10.4324/9780429499463
  8. 10.7551/mitpress/10513.001.0001
  9. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  10. 10.7330/9781607327585.c008
  11. 10.37514/TPC-B.2023.1923.2.27
  12. 10.1525/9780520957343
  13. 10.2307/j.ctt5vkftk
  14. 10.1215/08992363-14-1-49
  15. 10.1007/s43681-023-00348-8
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →