Abstract

This study investigates the role of stasis, an ancient rhetorical tool with both heuristic and analytic capabilities, in entrepreneurial rhetoric, specifically in pitching and question-and-answer sessions. Drawing from a multiyear sample of Shark Tank pitches, the author found that funders expect entrepreneurs to account for stases of being, quality, quantity, and place. The findings suggest a series of associated questions within each stasis. When these questions are answered unsuccessfully, standstills occur within the funding argument; when they are successfully addressed, the stasis passes, and ventures are more likely to receive funding. The author discusses the implications of this study for entrepreneurship and professional communication.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651920910219
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. Ciuchta M., Letwin C., Stevenson R., McMahon S., Huvaj M. (2018). Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: Sign…
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01002.x
  3. 10.5465/amj.2016.1008
  4. 10.1080/03637755009375016
    Communications Monographs  
  5. Hsieh H., Shannon S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 1…
  6. 10.1177/160940690900800305
  7. Kuratko D., Morris M. (2018). Examining the future trajectory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Management,…
  8. Marsh C. (2006). The syllogism of apologia: Rhetorical stasis theory and crisis communication. Public Relatio…
  9. Martens M., Jennings J., Jennings P. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role …
  10. Maxwell A. L., Levesque M. (2011, September). Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seekin…
  11. Newman S. (2002). Aristotle’s notion of “bringing-before-the-eyes”: Its contributions to Aristotelian and con…
  12. Nicholson L., Anderson A. R. (2005). News and nuances of the entrepreneurial myth and metaphor: Linguistic ga…
  13. O’Connor E. (2002). Storied business: Typology, intertextuality and traffic in entrepreneurial narrative. Jou…
  14. Pollack J., Rutherford M., Nagy B. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new ventur…
  15. Smith B., Viceisza A. (2018). Bite me! ABC’s Shark Tank as a path to entrepreneurship. Small Business Economi…
  16. Spinuzzi C., Nelson S., Thomson K. S., Lorenzini F., French R. A., Pogue G., Burback S., Momberger J. (2014, …
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →