Abstract

This study investigates the role of stasis, an ancient rhetorical tool with both heuristic and analytic capabilities, in entrepreneurial rhetoric, specifically in pitching and question-and-answer sessions. Drawing from a multiyear sample of Shark Tank pitches, the author found that funders expect entrepreneurs to account for stases of being, quality, quantity, and place. The findings suggest a series of associated questions within each stasis. When these questions are answered unsuccessfully, standstills occur within the funding argument; when they are successfully addressed, the stasis passes, and ventures are more likely to receive funding. The author discusses the implications of this study for entrepreneurship and professional communication.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651920910219
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (37) · 8 in this index

  1. ABC. (2019, March 21). About Shark Tank. https://abc.go.com/shows/shark-tank/about-the-show
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Shark Tank
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. The psychology of persuasion
Show all 37 →
  1. Ciuchta M., Letwin C., Stevenson R., McMahon S., Huvaj M. (2018). Betting on the coachable entrepreneur: Sign…
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01002.x
  3. 10.5465/amj.2016.1008
  4. 10.1080/03637755009375016
    Communications Monographs  
  5. Entis L. (2015, April 30). Want to go on Shark Tank? Here’s what you need to know. https://www.entrepreneur.c…
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Hsieh H., Shannon S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 1…
  9. The rhetorical idiom: Essays in rhetoric, oratory, language, and drama
  10. 10.1177/160940690900800305
  11. Keren H. (2016). Women in the Shark Tank : Entrepreneurship and f…
  12. Bending opinion: Essays on persuasion in the public domain
  13. Kuratko D., Morris M. (2018). Examining the future trajectory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Management,…
  14. Long R. (1983). The role of audience in Chaim Perelman’s New Rhetoric. JAC: Journal of Advanced Composition, …
  15. Marsh C. (2006). The syllogism of apologia: Rhetorical stasis theory and crisis communication. Public Relatio…
  16. Martens M., Jennings J., Jennings P. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role …
  17. Maxwell A. L., Levesque M. (2011, September). Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seekin…
  18. Moreau C. P. (2018, March 24–27). Discursive diversity in the entrepreneurial pitch: Creating and communicati…
  19. Journal of the Academy of Business Education
  20. Murphy B.Jr (2014, September 30). Ten things I learned by studying every Shark Tank …
  21. Rhetorica
  22. Nicholson L., Anderson A. R. (2005). News and nuances of the entrepreneurial myth and metaphor: Linguistic ga…
  23. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  24. O’Connor E. (2002). Storied business: Typology, intertextuality and traffic in entrepreneurial narrative. Jou…
  25. Pollack J., Rutherford M., Nagy B. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new ventur…
  26. Screeny T. (2018, June 1). Why Shark Tank is 100% fake. https://youtu.be/9shjFip6oyA
  27. Smith B., Viceisza A. (2018). Bite me! ABC’s Shark Tank as a path…
  28. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  29. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  30. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
  31. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and technique
  32. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal