Design in Observational Research on the Discourse of Medicine: Toward Disciplined Interdisciplinarity

Ellen Barton Wayne State University

Abstract

This article turns to the concept of interdisciplinarity as a framework for the design and development of observational studies investigating the discourse of medicine in language-based fields such as linguistics, rhetoric, composition, and professional communication. It argues that observational studies be designed as disciplined interdisciplinary studies, defined as research that makes an acknowledged contribution to both medicine and language studies. It proposes two guiding principles for the design of observational studies in medicine, both of which focus on issues of prospective design.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2001-07-01
DOI
10.1177/105065190101500303
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (15)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 15 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0957926599010004002
  2. 10.1177/1461445600002003001
  3. 10.2307/378840
  4. 10.1075/ni.10.2.04bar
  5. 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.6.1651
  6. The Knowledge Society
  7. 10.1056/NEJM199405263302113
  8. 10.1007/978-1-4612-2488-4
  9. 10.1001/jama.1994.03520220071033
  10. 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400030033006
CrossRef global citation count: 26 View in citation network →