Usability testing for oppression

Abstract

This study examines a document produced by the United States Department of Homeland Security handed out to immigrant parents during the "Family Separation Policy" crisis of 2018. The article examines whether such a document could be ethically tested for usability. Ultimately, the text argues that by the standards of the Belmont Report and the best practices in usability research, such a document would be extremely difficult (if not impossible) to test ethically. It argues that, while usability testing is an excellent tool for exploring how users interact with texts that can have life-changing consequences, it may also be used as a tool to perpetuate injustice and marginalize potential users.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2019-11-15
DOI
10.1145/3321388.3321390
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (15)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 15 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. College Composition and Communication
  10. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.5555/2817319.2817320
  2. Barnum C. M. (2011). Usability Testing Essentials: Ready Set... Test! Burlington MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishe…
  3. 10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.80
  4. 10.1111/acem.12271
  5. Holmes K. (2018). Mismatch: How inclusion shapes design. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Holmes K. (2018). Mismatch:…
  6. 10.2307/378062
  7. 10.2307/375964
  8. 10.5840/eip2003423
  9. 10.1109/IPCC.2009.5208689
  10. 10.5555/3294038.3294039
  11. 10.1109/TPC.2015.2425135
  12. Sauro J. & Lewis J. R. (2012). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Burli…
  13. Torres S. A. Santiago C. D. Walts K. K. & Richards M. H. (2018). Immigration policy practices and procedures:…
  14. Willerton R. (2015). Plain Language and ethical action: A dialogic approach to technical content in the 21st …
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →