Abstract

In this essay, Tulley and Blair combine instructional and editorial perspectives to analyze how the process of digital composing reshapes often entrenched notions of authorship and composing practice within the English major by having students reenvision a traditional print genre, the book review, in digital space.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2009-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2009-005
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 10 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Computers and Composition
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bolter, Jay D. 2001. Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence …
  2. Bolter, Jay, and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Boston: MIT Press.
  3. Brodkey, Linda. 1987. “Modernism and the Scene(s) of Writing.” College English49.4: 396–418.
  4. Elbow, Peter. 1995. “Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic: A Conflict in Goals.” College Composition and Comm…
  5. Gee, James Paul. 2003. What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. Hampshire, England: Palgrave.
  6. Grabill, Jeffrey, and Troy Hicks. 2005. “Multiliteracies Meet Methods: The Case for Digital Writing in Englis…
  7. Rice, Jeff. 2006. “What Should College English Be? Networks and New Media.” College English69.2: 127–33.
  8. Selfe, Cynthia. 2004. “Students Who Teach Us.” In Wysocki et al.: 43–66.
  9. Stroupe, Craig. 2000. “Visualizing English: Recognizing the Hybrid Literacy of Visual and Verbal Authorship o…
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →