Abstract

Communication apprehension can lead to professional challenges for individuals, teams, and organizations. This is the first study of communication apprehension that involved a randomized national survey of working adults in the United States and captured broad representation in terms of age, gender, race/ethnicity, managerial status, and other factors. The study showed that communication apprehension is common, including in group discussions, meetings, interpersonal situations, and public speaking. It is significantly more common among early-career professionals, women, introverted professionals, and professionals with anxiety. Interpersonal situations appear to be the situations in which contemporary professionals are most likely to experience high communication apprehension. This study suggests more attention is needed to address communication apprehension in interpersonal and group situations. It also frames communication apprehension as a matter of inclusion and team performance.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2023-03-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906221129599
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/08934215.2020.1780456
  2. 10.1080/03634529809379106
  3. 10.1007/s10551-019-04180-1
  4. 10.3109/09638288.2012.751135
  5. 10.5465/amle.2011.0127
  6. 10.1348/096317909X463652
  7. 10.1080/03634529209378871
  8. 10.1080/08832323.2011.576280
  9. 10.1080/23808985.2019.1602783
  10. 10.1177/0956797617746749
  11. 10.1037/a0038543
  12. 10.1080/03634523.2019.1684535
  13. 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
  14. 10.1080/03634529809379118
  15. 10.1177/1745691620919358
  16. 10.1080/01463379209369828
  17. 10.1177/108056999605900314
  18. 10.1177/0956797612463706
  19. 10.3390/ijerph14050466
  20. 10.5688/ajpe8018
  21. 10.3390/educsci10120379
  22. 10.1177/002194369703400104
  23. 10.1177/2329488419856803
  24. 10.1080/03634527209377961
  25. 10.1080/03634527709378196
  26. 10.1080/03637757809375965
  27. 10.1080/23808985.1982.11678497
  28. 10.4324/9781315663791
  29. 10.1080/01463378509369595
  30. 10.1080/01463378909385531
  31. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2009.tb00054.x
  32. 10.1080/08824096.2019.1683527
  33. 10.1080/07491409.2014.911231
  34. 10.1016/j.jad.2010.01.072
  35. 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.016
  36. 10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390
  37. 10.1037/0022-006X.56.4.520
  38. 10.1080/08832323.1993.10117613
  39. 10.1080/03634529709379080
  40. 10.1016/0748-5751(94)90023-X
  41. 10.1080/08959285.2012.721832
  42. 10.1177/0956797616658563
  43. 10.1108/S1085-462220140000015001
  44. 10.1111/cpsp.12216
  45. 10.1080/08832320209599070
  46. 10.1037/apl0000892
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network →