ABSTRACTWith respect to Benjamin’s treatments of the work of art and his historiographical method, Adorno accuses Benjamin of not being dialectical enough and of inadequate theorizing. This article argues that Adorno’s blanket prescription for more dialectics covers over a chiastic relationship between his particular concern in each case. On one hand, Adorno worries that Benjamin gives over the artwork to ideological narratives. On the other hand, Adorno is concerned that Benjamin’s historical materialism refuses historical narrative, which is precisely where Benjamin locates ideology. Indeed the disruptive potential that Adorno grants the artwork with respect to social and political ideology thus corresponds to the disruptive potential that Benjamin ascribes to his historical materialism with respect to historicist ideology. In this context the article considers the nature of autonomy for Benjamin and Adorno and its relationship to subversion, disruption, and redemption.

Research Article| September 01 2011 Pragmatism, Experience, and William James's Politics of Blindness Paul Stob Paul Stob Department of Communication Studies, Vanderbilt University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (3): 227–249. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0227 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Paul Stob; Pragmatism, Experience, and William James's Politics of Blindness. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 227–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0227 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| September 01 2011 A Normative Pragmatic Model of Making Fear Appeals Beth Innocenti Beth Innocenti University of Kansas, Communication Studies Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (3): 273–290. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0273 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Beth Innocenti; A Normative Pragmatic Model of Making Fear Appeals. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 273–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0273 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2011 What is Talmud? The Art of Disagreement Dolgopolski, SergeiWhat is Talmud? The Art of Disagreement. New York: Fordham University Press, 2009. 346 pp. Cloth $60.00 Michael Bernard–Donals Michael Bernard–Donals Department of English, University of Wisconsin, Madison Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (3): 291–296. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0291 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Michael Bernard–Donals; What is Talmud? The Art of Disagreement. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 291–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0291 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| September 01 2011 A Defense of War and Sport Metaphors in Argument Scott Aikin Scott Aikin Philosophy Department, Vanderbilt University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (3): 250–272. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0250 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Scott Aikin; A Defense of War and Sport Metaphors in Argument. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 250–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0250 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| September 01 2011 The Prudential Public Sphere David Randall David Randall Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (3): 205–226. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0205 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation David Randall; The Prudential Public Sphere. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 205–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0205 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| June 01 2011 Culture +Rhetoric: Studies in Rhetoric and Culture Streker, Ivo; Tyler, Stephen, eds. Culture +Rhetoric: Studies in Rhetoric and Culture. Oxford, UK: Berghahn, 2009. 255 pp. Cloth $90.00. Michael Kaplan Michael Kaplan Indiana University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (2): 194–204. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.2.0194 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Michael Kaplan; Culture +Rhetoric: Studies in Rhetoric and Culture. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 June 2011; 44 (2): 194–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.2.0194 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Abstract In this work, I argue that creative metaphors are formed when some persistent problem, caused by an inadequacy in preexisting knowledge, descends into the collective unconscious, is reconfigured unconsciously in novel ways, and then reemerges back into consciousness where the impasse is resolved by the metaphorical expression of new knowledge. To develop this position, I (1) review and critique some well-known language-based studies of metaphor, (2) summarize psychoanalytic and depth psychological approaches to the psyche as one way to overcome the shortcomings of the language-based scholarship, (3) relate C. G. Jung's account of the psyche and his related notion of synchronicity to creative metaphors, (4) graft a quantum physics approach to material reality back onto Jung's work as a provisional structure of the collective unconscious, and finally, (5) offer some suggestions about how creative metaphors might work psychologically.

Research Article| March 01 2011 Maintaining the World's Architecture Dominique de Courcelles Dominique de Courcelles Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Centre d'études en rhétorique, philosophie, et histoire des idées, Ecole normale, supérieure des lettres et sciences humaines de Lyon Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (1): 72–78. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0072 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Dominique de Courcelles; Maintaining the World's Architecture. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 March 2011; 44 (1): 72–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0072 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| March 01 2011 Addressing Animals Erik Doxtader Erik Doxtader Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (1): 79–80. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0079 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Erik Doxtader; Addressing Animals. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 March 2011; 44 (1): 79–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0079 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Abstract The Stoic is often seen as the forerunner of Adam Smith's market man of morals, but others have suggested that the sophist played a role in the formation of market morality and political economy. This article traces Smith's treatment of ancient sophists and his use of the term sophistry in the Wealth of Nations. Smith praised ancient sophists for their effective didactic oratory and their ability to make money through teaching. Smith criticized arguments as sophistic when they promoted monetary advantage for a few over and above the principle of competition. This varied reception of sophists and sophistry suggests a keen understanding of the rhetorical tradition and its capacity to influence the development of the discourse of political economy. Smith's use of sophistry and reference to the sophists invites a deeper awareness of the essential vitality of effective argumentation for Smith's “system of natural liberty.”

AbstractTo the ancient mind, magic was a powerful force to be subjected to or to control. Egypt, more than any other early culture, stressed the importance of intellectual agency as the antidote to the imperfection perceived between foundational thinking and anti-foundational speaking. Just as rhetoric seeks to express the conceptual ideal pursued by philosophical inquiry, these earlier thinkers stressed magical language as the key to unlocking the power of the cosmos. This article will explore the Ancient Egyptian concept of rhetorical magic as a practical wisdom that allows an individual to function fully within the boundaries established by a perceived cosmic order. The Ancient Egyptians applied rhetorical magic to ease the dissonance felt between intellectual engagement and the semiotically saturated cosmology in which they dwelt. These same ancient rhetorical practices hold promise in assisting our own attempts to navigate a world inundated with information.

Research Article| March 01 2011 Toward a Bestial Rhetoric Debra Hawhee Debra Hawhee Department of English, Pennsylvania State University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (1): 81–87. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0081 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Debra Hawhee; Toward a Bestial Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 March 2011; 44 (1): 81–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0081 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| March 01 2011 Creaturely Rhetorics Diane Davis Diane Davis Department of Rhetoric and Writing/Department of English, University of Texas-Austin Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (1): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0088 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Diane Davis; Creaturely Rhetorics. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 March 2011; 44 (1): 88–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0088 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

AbstractJohn Dewey's work on aesthetics, community, and art holds many untapped resources for the study and melioration of communicative practices. This article explores Dewey's distinctive and pluralistic idea of criticism and argues that such a notion can be used to elaborate pragmatist rhetoric. To lend contrast to this endeavor, I develop the concept of the “implied critic,” and compare the sort of critic assumed by Deweyan pragmatism to the critic implied by Raymie McKerrow's critical rhetoric. What a pragmatist approach to rhetorical criticism entails will be detailed by examining the variety of purposes that can be pursued by an individual in reflecting on rhetorical artifacts. Such a pragmatist rhetoric explains the notion of artful criticism that Dewey features so prominently in his analysis of ideal forms of community.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Rhetoric, Grief, and the Imagination in Early Modern England Stephen Pender Stephen Pender Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (1): 54–85. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0054 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Stephen Pender; Rhetoric, Grief, and the Imagination in Early Modern England. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (1): 54–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0054 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| January 01 2010 The Rhetoric of St. Augustine of Hippo: "De Doctrina Christiana" and the Search for a Distinctly Christian The Rhetoric of St. Augustine of Hippo: "De Doctrina Christiana" and the Search for a Distinctly Christian Rhetoric. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2008. Pp. 420. $44.95, paperback. Leo Enos, Richard; Thompson, Roger Calvin L. Troup Calvin L. Troup Duquesne University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (1): 86–90. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0086 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Calvin L. Troup; The Rhetoric of St. Augustine of Hippo: "De Doctrina Christiana" and the Search for a Distinctly Christian. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (1): 86–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0086 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Universalities James Crosswhite James Crosswhite Department of English University of Oregon Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 430–448. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0430 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation James Crosswhite; Universalities. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 430–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0430 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| January 01 2010 By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication.Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2005. 299 pp. $28.00, paper. Pinchevski, Amit Diane Davis Diane Davis Department of Rhetoric and Writing University of Texas at Austin Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (3): 289–295. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0289 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Diane Davis; By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (3): 289–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0289 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Ways of Being Reasonable:Perelman and the Philosophers Christopher W. Tindale Christopher W. Tindale University of Windsor Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 337–361. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Christopher W. Tindale; Ways of Being Reasonable:Perelman and the Philosophers. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 337–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme Manfred Kraus Manfred Kraus Department of Classics University of Tübingen Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 362–382. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Manfred Kraus; Perelman's Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 362–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0362 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 The Brussels School of Rhetoric:From the New Rhetoric to Problematology Michel Meyer Michel Meyer University of Brussels mimeyer@ulb.ac.be Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 403–429. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0403 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Michel Meyer; The Brussels School of Rhetoric:From the New Rhetoric to Problematology. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 403–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0403 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Why Socrates and Thrasymachus Become Friends Catherine Zuckert Catherine Zuckert Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (2): 163–185. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.2.0163 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Catherine Zuckert; Why Socrates and Thrasymachus Become Friends. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (2): 163–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.2.0163 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 The Sociopath and the Ring of Gyges:A Problem in Rhetorical and Moral Philosophy Donald Phillip Verene Donald Phillip Verene Department of Philosophy Emory University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (3): 201–221. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0201 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Donald Phillip Verene; The Sociopath and the Ring of Gyges:A Problem in Rhetorical and Moral Philosophy. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (3): 201–221. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0201 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism:Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy Catherine Chaput Catherine Chaput Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Catherine Chaput; Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism:Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (1): 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| January 01 2010 The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2007. 314 pp. $60.00, cloth; $38.00, paper. Tracy, Karen; McDaniel, James P.; Gronbeck, Bruce E. Christine Harold Christine Harold Department of Communication University of Washington Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (3): 296–300. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0296 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Christine Harold; The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (3): 296–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0296 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 A Bibliography of the New Rhetoric Project David A. Frank; David A. Frank Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google William Driscoll William Driscoll Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 449–466. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0449 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation David A. Frank, William Driscoll; A Bibliography of the New Rhetoric Project. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 449–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0449 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law Francis J. Mootz III Francis J. Mootz III William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada, Las Vegas Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (4): 383–402. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Francis J. Mootz III; Perelman’s Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (4): 383–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0383 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © Copyright 2010 The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.Copyright 2010 The Pennsylvania State UniversityThe Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: ARTICLES You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Proof and Persuasion in the Philosophical Debate about Abortion Chris Kaposy Chris Kaposy Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (2): 139–162. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.2.0139 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Chris Kaposy; Proof and Persuasion in the Philosophical Debate about Abortion. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (2): 139–162. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.2.0139 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| January 01 2010 Five Chapters on Rhetoric: Character, Action, Things, Nothing, and Art Five Chapters on Rhetoric: Character, Action, Things, Nothing, and Art.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009. 184 pp. $65.00, cloth. Kochin, Michael S. Paul Stob Paul Stob Department of Communication Studies Vanderbilt University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (3): 284–288. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0284 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Paul Stob; Five Chapters on Rhetoric: Character, Action, Things, Nothing, and Art. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (3): 284–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0284 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| January 01 2010 Rhetoric and Power:An Inquiry into Foucault’s Critique of Confession Dave Tell Dave Tell Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (2): 95–117. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.2.0095 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Dave Tell; Rhetoric and Power:An Inquiry into Foucault’s Critique of Confession. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (2): 95–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.2.0095 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.