How Does the Language Control of L1 and L2 Writers Develop Over Time in First-Year Composition?

Grant Eckstein Brigham Young University ; Ruei-Han Chang Brigham Young University

Abstract

Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students’ written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2022-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221099474
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

References (101) · 9 in this index

  1. 27th Annual Symposium of the Computer-Assisted Language Consortium CALICO-10
  2. 10.1075/scl.59.15ai
  3. Assessing Writing
  4. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
  5. 10.2307/3588074
Show all 101 →
  1. Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900–1985
  2. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
  3. The effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: A meta-analysis
  4. 10.4324/9780203832400
  5. 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90020-X
  6. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjsd2
  7. 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100776
  8. College Composition and Communication
  9. Language and thought
  10. 10.2307/358546
  11. 10.2307/357695
  12. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.001
  13. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.001
  14. Council of Writing Program Administrators. (2020). WPA outcomes statement for first-year composition (3.0). R…
  15. 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002
  16. 10.1177/00336882211018540
  17. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.11.002
  18. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001
  19. WOE
  20. The Peer Review
  21. 10.1002/tesq.376
  22. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.004
  23. Writing and Pedagogy
  24. 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016
  25. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
  26. 10.5054/tq.2011.247706
  27. Journal of Writing Research
  28. Research in the Teaching of English
  29. 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
  30. CATESOL Journal
  31. Hafernik J. J. (1991). Relationships among English writing experience, contrastive rhetoric, and English expo…
  32. Journal of Response to Writing
  33. 10.5054/tq.2010.213781
  34. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
  35. 10.2307/376562
  36. 10.2307/377147
  37. 10.2307/3588505
  38. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning
  39. 10.7330/9781607326205
  40. 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  41. Teaching and researching writing
  42. Institute of International Education. (2019). Open Doors 2019 fast facts. Institute of International Educatio…
  43. Johnson J., Lee E., Schreiber B., Fahim N. (Eds.). (2020). Promoting social justice for multilingual writers …
  44. Written Communication
  45. 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1990.tb00683.x
  46. 10.1111/modl.12189
  47. English Teaching: Practice and Critique
  48. 10.1002/tesq.366
  49. A synthesis of research on second language writing in English
  50. 10.2307/30044673
  51. Lexis in composition
  52. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
  53. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
  54. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x
  55. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
  56. College Composition and Communication
  57. College Composition and Communication
  58. 10.1080/07908318.2019.1676768
  59. 10.1002/tesq.111
  60. 10.1080/14790718.2016.1253699
  61. 10.2307/358488
  62. Writing Program Administration
  63. 10.2307/25472180
  64. Writing Program Administration
  65. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.10.001
  66. 10.1093/elt/XXXV.3.310
  67. 10.1515/iral.1983.21.4.299
  68. 10.2307/358628
  69. College Composition and Communication
  70. 10.17077/etd.ra6xmz64
  71. 10.2307/3594187
  72. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.01.001
  73. National Census of Writing. (n.d.). 2017 four-year institution survey [Data fields]. https://writingcensus.uc…
  74. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492
  75. College Composition and Communication
  76. 10.1080/15235882.2003.10162589
  77. Perryman-Clark S., Kirkland D.E., Jackson A. (2015). Students’ right to their own language: A critical source…
  78. 10.2307/3586828
  79. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X
  80. Composition Forum
  81. SRATE Journal
  82. 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90017-J
  83. Focus on Teacher Education
  84. 10.2307/3587296
  85. 10.2307/3587400
  86. 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00215.x
  87. Idiomaticity in the basic writing of American English
  88. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
  89. Stuart C. D. (2012). Succeeding through uncertainty: Three L2 students in a first-year composition class [Doc…
  90. 10.1002/tesq.91
  91. 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00618-0
  92. 10.1353/foc.2011.0009
  93. Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need
  94. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003
  95. The emergence of the American university
  96. 10.2307/3587297