How Does the Language Control of L1 and L2 Writers Develop Over Time in First-Year Composition?

Grant Eckstein Brigham Young University ; Ruei-Han Chang Brigham Young University

Abstract

Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students’ written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2022-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883221099474
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 67 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1075/scl.59.15ai
  2. 10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00015-5
  3. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
  4. 10.2307/3588074
  5. 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
  6. 10.4324/9780203832400
  7. 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90020-X
  8. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjsd2
  9. 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100776
  10. 10.2307/358546
  11. 10.2307/357695
  12. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.001
  13. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.001
  14. 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002
  15. 10.1177/00336882211018540
  16. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.11.002
  17. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.09.001
  18. 10.1002/tesq.376
  19. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.004
  20. 10.1558/wap.19540
  21. 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.016
  22. 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.007
  23. 10.5054/tq.2011.247706
  24. 10.17239/jowr-2020.12.02.02
  25. 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
  26. 10.5054/tq.2010.213781
  27. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
  28. 10.2307/376562
  29. 10.2307/377147
  30. 10.2307/3588505
  31. 10.7330/9781607326205
  32. 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1990.tb00683.x
  34. 10.1111/modl.12189
  35. 10.1002/tesq.366
  36. 10.2307/30044673
  37. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
  38. 10.5054/tq.2011.240859
  39. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x
  40. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
  41. 10.1080/07908318.2019.1676768
  42. 10.1002/tesq.111
  43. 10.1080/14790718.2016.1253699
  44. 10.2307/358488
  45. 10.2307/25472180
  46. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.10.001
  47. 10.1093/elt/XXXV.3.310
  48. 10.1515/iral.1983.21.4.299
  49. 10.2307/358628
  50. 10.17077/etd.ra6xmz64
  51. 10.2307/3594187
  52. 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.01.001
  53. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492
  54. 10.1080/15235882.2003.10162589
  55. 10.2307/3586828
  56. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80112-X
  57. 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90017-J
  58. 10.2307/3587296
  59. 10.2307/3587400
  60. 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00215.x
  61. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
  62. 10.1002/tesq.91
  63. 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00618-0
  64. 10.1353/foc.2011.0009
  65. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003
  66. The emergence of the American university
  67. 10.2307/3587297
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →