Technological Mediation of Document Review

Jason Swarts North Carolina State University

Abstract

This article reports findings from a study of writers and reviewers in two complex organizations. The author analyzes the differences between the content, conduct, and resolution of document reviews mediated by hard-copy text and those mediated by textual replay (a series of screen-captured images of the writer’s on-screen writing activity) plus hard-copytext. The results show that reviews mediated by textual replay directed greater attention to issues concerning writing and revision processes. The reviewers offered more tentative revision suggestions and more often enlisted the writers’ participation in articulating, proposing, and implementing the revisions. The article concludes by considering ways that textual replay could be further designed to support the range of joint activities that document review comprises.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2004-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651904264037
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Written Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
  2. 10.2307/356095
  3. 10.2307/357846
  4. 10.1177/016224399101600402
  5. 10.1145/353485.353487
  6. 10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
  7. 10.1109/47.678552
  8. 10.1109/47.712348
  9. 10.1109/47.44536
  10. 10.37514/LLD-J.2001.5.2.03
    Language and Learning Across the Disciplines  
  11. Control through communication: The rise of system in American management
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →