Abstract

The ubiquity of social media for professional and personal purposes has proven both an asset to scholars in writing studies (broadly conceived) and, in some cases, a cause for concern. Recent news events suggest that institutional decision-making surrounding social media is reactionary, severe, and steeped in discussions of "risky behaviors." These events (and others) result in anxiety surrounding social media use among individuals and organizations. In this article, we respond to these concerns with an empirical, mixed methods pilot study that investigates the ways new and emergent scholars might mitigate potential problems associated with social media use. The article presents preliminary findings that destabilize rule-based approaches and introduce uncertainties and vulnerabilities that accompany social media use.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2017-03-22
DOI
10.1145/3068698.3068703
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (15)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 15 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Computers and Composition
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/1461444810365313
  2. 10.1145/1878450.1878468
  3. 10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087195
  4. 10.1080/00918369.2013.824341
  5. 10.1080/07491409.2012.754388
  6. 10.1123/ijsc.4.4.492
  7. 10.1080/17459435.2013.835348
  8. Qualitative analysis for social scientists
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →