IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2024

University–Industry Collaboration in Managing Translation Projects: Perceptions and Responses From Students, Instructors, and Industry Partners

Daqin Cao Xi'an International Studies University ; Jianfen Chen ; Shijie Liu

Abstract

About the case: This case study examines how students, instructors, and industry partners in university and industry collaborative translation projects perceive and respond to their experiences with these projects. It reports on collaborative translation projects at Xi'an International Studies University, involving the active participation of three stakeholders. Situating the case: Translation and technical and professional communication (TPC) education both prioritize cultivating students’ practical skills of producing audience-centered content. They both value collaborative approaches as effective methods for bridging the gap between academia and industry. Although TPC education aims to foster students’ technical and professional writing competence and prepare them for industry demands, translation education focuses on developing students’ translation competence through context-dependent learning. Various models have been proposed to define translation competence, with the multicomponent model being the most prominent. This model emphasizes multiple skills and attributes that translators need, reflecting the influence of market demands and technological advancements. Collaborative approaches like project-based learning (PjBL) have been advocated to bridge the gap between academia and industry. However, research at the program level and from stakeholders’ perspectives remains limited. Methods: We adopted a mixed-method strategy and employed surveys and one-on-one interviews to examine the responses from the stakeholders about their experiences and the impacts of the collaborative translation projects. Results: Statistical analysis of the surveys and thematic analysis of interviews and open-ended questions indicate that all stakeholders concur with the projects’ benefits in enhancing students’ translation competence and shortening the gap between classroom translation education and market demands. Despite these benefits, all stakeholders face various challenges that should be addressed by expanding the scalability and sustainability of collaborative projects, fostering closer and direct collaboration between instructors and industry partners, and enhancing the ethics of professional code and strategic competence of students. Conclusion: Based on the research results, we suggest further research directed at the sustainability of these projects and the scalability of their benefits toward a bigger population of students.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2024.3411922
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Liu (2026)
    Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Study of Students’ and LSPs’ Perceptions of Tra…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Batova (2021)
    An Approach for Incorporating Community-Engaged Learning in Intensive Online Cl…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Bourelle (2014)
    Adapting Service-Learning into the Online Technical Communication Classroom: A …
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Scott (2008)
    The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Starke-Meyerring et al. (2007)
    Global Partnerships: Positioning Technical Communication Programs in the Contex…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 36 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.18778/1731-7533.18.2.02
     ↗
  2. 10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3.ch009
     ↗
  3. Buysschaert (2018)
    Embracing digital disruption in translator training: Technology immersion in simulated tr…
    Tradumtica: Tecnol. Traducci  ↗
  4. 10.3390/su14063140
     ↗
  5. 10.1075/btl.54
     ↗
  6. 10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856066
     ↗
  7. 10.1007/978-981-16-8329-9_17
     ↗
  8. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315
     ↗
  9. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.784
     ↗
  10. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.753
     ↗
  11. 10.1163/9789087904753_005
     ↗
  12. 10.4018/IJSKD.2016070103
     ↗
  13. 10.1080/14703297.2010.518423
     ↗
  14. 10.1080/03043797.2013.833170
     ↗
  15. 10.1080/02615479.2014.935731
     ↗
  16. 10.1080/13562517.2017.1421628
     ↗
  17. 10.1080/03043797.2016.1189880
     ↗
  18. 10.1177/1053825917750407
     ↗
  19. 10.1177/1077695816686440
     ↗
  20. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1048505
     ↗
  21. 10.4018/978-1-5225-4154-7.ch009
     ↗
  22. 10.1080/1750399x.2018.1564542
     ↗
  23. 10.1080/1750399x.2023.2237837
     ↗
  24. 10.1007/s10758-023-09679-1
     ↗
  25. 10.1080/1750399X.2022.2101849
     ↗
  26. 10.7202/008533ar
     ↗
  27. 10.7202/002190ar
     ↗
  28. 10.1075/btl
     ↗
  29. 10.1075/target.8.2.07cao
     ↗
  30. 10.4324/9781315760186
     ↗
  31. 10.4324/9781315760292
     ↗
  32. 10.1080/1750399x.2021.2017706
     ↗
  33. 10.1080/1750399X.2022.2082813
     ↗
  34. 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
     ↗
  35. 10.1037/1099-9809.10.1.66
     ↗
  36. 10.1177/1609406917733847
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Mar 2026
    Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Collaborative Writing: Practices, Challenges, and Support Structures ↗
    Stephen Carradini; Ed Nagelhout
    collaborative writing professional writing labor and working conditions qualitative research
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2025
    Relational Realities of Readiness: What Managers Wish Colleges Knew About Business Communication ↗
    Laura Nicole Miller; Karen McCullough
    collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research disability studies
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Oct 2025
    The Evaporating Cloud as a Business Communication Tool: A Systematic Framework for Conflict Analysis and Persuasive Compositions in the Workplace ↗
    Mahesh C. Gupta; Annika Reitenga; Christina Davidson
    collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jun 2025
    Reimagining Communication Pedagogy for Virtual Workplaces: Work-From-Home Study Implications ↗
    Manoj Kumar Mishra; Amarnath Padhi; Deepika Sharma; Uday Sharma
    writing pedagogy collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research
  5. Communication Design Quarterly Sep 2024
    Collaboration as a Shared Value: Instructor and Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning in Online Business Writing Courses ↗
    Brigitte Mussack; Jason Tham
    writing pedagogy collaborative writing professional writing qualitative research