Abstract

This article links language requirements in rhetoric and composition graduate programs to a dominant monolingualist ideology in composition studies. It argues that future faculty can be best prepared to conduct disciplinary work in the context of linguistic heterogeneity through a variety of collaborative pedagogical practices that reflect and advance a “translingual” language ideology.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2015-10-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2015.1073560
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College English

Cites in this index (6)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/0-306-48195-2
  2. 10.2307/802485
    English Journal  
  3. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations
  4. 10.1177/026765839100700203
    Second Language Research  
  5. 10.1080/09500782.2012.663552
    Language and Education  
  6. 10.1177/1474022204039645
  7. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x
    The Modern Language Journal  
  8. 10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5
    Brain Language  
  9. 10.1093/applin/aml013
    Applied Linguistics  
  10. 10.2307/1512118
    College Composition and Communication  
  11. 10.1080/02188790600608091
    Asia Pacific Journal of Education  
  12. 10.2307/25472180
    College English  
  13. 10.1080/14790710902846707
    International Journal of Multilingualism  
  14. 10.2307/358427
    College Composition and Communication  
  15. 10.1080/19313152.2011.594367
    International Multilingual Research Journal  
  16. 10.1632/prof.2006.2006.1.203
    Profession  
  17. Writing Programs Worldwide: Profiles of Academic Writing in Many Places
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →