Computers and Composition Jun 2019

Teachers as co-authors of student writing: How teachers’ initiating texts influence response and revision in an online space

Alecia Marie Magnifico University of New Hampshire ; Rebecca Woodard University of Illinois Chicago ; Sarah McCarthey
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2019-06-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2019.01.005
Open Access
Closed
Topics
revision

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Monea (2020)
    Looking At Screens: Examining Human-Computer Interaction and Communicative Brea…
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Leijen (2017)
    A Novel Approach to Examine the Impact of Web-based Peer Review on the Revision…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Loretto et al. (2016)
    Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Peer Review of Writing
    Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Chang (2012)
    Peer Review via Three Modes in an EFL Writing Course
    Computers and Composition
  4. Guardado et al. (2007)
    ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback
    Computers and Composition
  5. Hayes et al. (2006)
    Is Working Memory Involved in the Transcribing and Editing of Texts?
    Written Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Tuzi (2004)
    The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course
    Computers and Composition
  2. Beason (1993)
    Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes
    Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Nelson (1990)
    This Was an Easy Assignment: Examining How Students Interpret Academic Writing Tasks
    Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. Applebee (2011)
    “EJ” Extra: A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools
    English Journal  ↗
  2. Cho (2010)
    Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
    Learning and Instruction  ↗
  3. Delpit (1988)
    The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children
    Harvard Education Review  ↗
  4. Ferris (1997)
    The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  5. Graham (2015)
    Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis
    Elementary School Journal  ↗
  6. Kline (2013)
    Democratizing classroom discourse: The challenge for online writing environments
    E-Learning and Digital Media  ↗
  7. Lundstrom (2009)
    To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  8. McCarthey (1994)
    Authors, text, and talk: The internalization of dialogue from social interaction during writing
    Reading Research Quarterly  ↗
  9. McCutchen (2000)
    Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing
    Educational Psychologist  ↗
  10. McGroarty (1997)
    Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision
    Language Learning  ↗
  11. Magnifico (2010)
    Writing for whom: Cognition, motivation, and a writer’s audience
    Educational Psychologist  ↗
  12. Magnifico (2015)
    Words on the screen: Broadening analyses of interactions among fanfiction writers and reviewers
    Literacy  ↗
  13. O’Connor (1993)
    Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroo…
    Anthropology & Education Quarterly  ↗
  14. Reid (1994)
    Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  15. Rish (2015)
    Researching writing events: Using mediated discourse analysis to explore how students wri…
    Literacy  ↗
  16. Smith (2016)
    Composing across modes: A comparative analysis of adolescents’ multimodal composing processes
    Learning, Media & Technology  ↗
  17. Soep (2006)
    Critique: Assessment and the production of learning
    Teachers College Record  ↗
  18. Spandel (2006)
    Speaking my mind: In defense of rubrics
    English Journal  ↗
  19. Trautmann (2003)
    Online peer review: Learning science as it’s practiced
    Journal of College Science Teaching  ↗
  20. Tseng (2007)
    On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school compute…
    Computers & Education  ↗
  21. Witte (2013)
    Preaching what we practice: A study of revision
    Journal of Curriculum and Instruction  ↗
  22. Woodard (2013)
    Supporting teacher metacognition about formative assessment in online writing environments
    E-Learning & Digital Media  ↗
  23. Zhao (2014)
    Participation, interaction and social presence: An exploratory study of collaboration in …
    British Journal of Educational Technology  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗
    Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
    assessment curriculum design multimodality multilingual writers revision
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly Jan 2026
    “Review of Rethinking Peer Review: Critical Reflections on a Pedagogical Practice” ↗
    Joe Schicke
    multilingual writers revision
  3. Written Communication Jan 2026
    The Contributions of Student-Level and Classroom-Level Factors for Australian Grade 2 Students’ Writing Performance ↗
    Anabela Malpique; Mustafa Asil; Deborah Pino-Pasternak; Debora Valcan
    multimodality multilingual writers revision
  4. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2026
    Exhausted: The Toll of Hyper-revision on a Writing Center Administrator ↗
    writing centers revision
  5. Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2025
    Useful and Appropriate: Preservice ELA Teacher Reactions to Feedback on EL Student Writing ↗
    Meghan Odsliv Bratkovich; Michael B. Sherry; Homood Alharbi
    qualitative research translingualism revision