Computers and Composition Jun 2004

The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course

Frank Tuzi MTS Technologies (United States)
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2004-06-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
writing pedagogy multilingual writers
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (16)

  1. Zhang et al. (2023)
    Student engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from reflective j…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Arques et al. (2023)
    Peer-feedback of an occluded genre in the Spanish language classroom: A case study
    Assessing Writing
  3. Huang et al. (2021)
    Using automated feedback to develop writing proficiency
    Computers and Composition
  4. Lam (2021)
    A web-based feedback platform for peer and teacher feedback on writing: An Acti…
    Computers and Composition
  5. Magnifico et al. (2019)
    Teachers as co-authors of student writing: How teachers’ initiating texts influ…
    Computers and Composition
Show all 16 →
  1. Holcomb et al. (2018)
    First-Year Composition as “Big Data”: Towards Examining Student Revisions at Scale
    Computers and Composition
  2. Li et al. (2017)
    Online Peer Review Using Turnitin in First-Year Writing Classes
    Computers and Composition
  3. Leijen (2017)
    A Novel Approach to Examine the Impact of Web-based Peer Review on the Revision…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Chang (2016)
    EFL Reviewers’ Emoticon Use in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Peer Response
    Computers and Composition
  5. Chen (2012)
    Blog-Based Peer Reviewing in EFL Writing Classrooms for Chinese Speakers
    Computers and Composition
  6. Chang (2012)
    Peer Review via Three Modes in an EFL Writing Course
    Computers and Composition
  7. Jin et al. (2010)
    Dynamic Motives in ESL Computer-Mediated Peer Response
    Computers and Composition
  8. Garrison (2009)
    An Empirical Analysis of Using Text-to-Speech Software to Revise First-Year Col…
    Computers and Composition
  9. Guardado et al. (2007)
    ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback
    Computers and Composition
  10. Dyehouse (2007)
    A politics for interactivity: Progressivism and its limits in federal congressi…
    Computers and Composition
  11. Pew et al. (2005)
    Studying L2 writers’ digital writing: An argument for post-critical methods
    Computers and Composition

References (29) · 3 in this index

  1. Berg (1999)
    The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  2. Berger (1990)
    The effects of peer and self-feedback
    CATESOL Journal  ↗
  3. Bloom, Benjamin S. (1950). Problem solving processes of college students: An exploratory investigation [Suppl…
  4. Braine (1997)
    Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes
    Computers and Composition
  5. Carson (1996)
    Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
Show all 29 →
  1. Connor (1994)
    Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  2. Curtis, Anne. (1997, November). Is it better to give than receive: Feedback in student writing. Paper present…
  3. DiGiovanni (2001)
    Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face?
    ELT Journal  ↗
  4. Ferris, Dana, & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice. Mahwah, NJ: …
  5. Hall (1990)
    Managing the complexity of revising across languages
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  6. Hedgecock (1992)
    Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  7. Hewett (2000)
    Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and i…
    Computers and Composition
  8. Leki (1990)
    Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes
    CATESOL Journal  ↗
  9. MacLeod (1999)
    Computer-aided peer review of writing
    Business Communications Quarterly  ↗
  10. Mangelsdorf (1992)
    ESL student response stances in a peer-review task
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  11. Mendonça (1994)
    Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  12. Mittan, Robert. (1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power. In Donna M. Johnso…
  13. Nelson (1998)
    ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  14. Palmquist (1993)
    Network-supported interaction in two writing classrooms
    Computers and Composition
  15. Paulus (1999)
    The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  16. Stanley (1992)
    Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  17. Sullivan (1998)
    Computer-mediated peer review of student papers
    Journal of Education for Business  ↗
  18. Tannacito, Terry. (1999). Electronic peer response groups: Case studies of computer mediated communication in…
  19. Tsui (2000)
    Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  20. Geest et al. (1994)
    The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups
    Computers and Composition
  21. Villamil (1996)
    Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  22. Warschauer (1997)
    Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice
    Modern Language Journal  ↗
  23. Zhang (1995)
    Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  24. Zhang (1999)
    Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 133 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    “Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗
    Qianqian Zhang-Wu
    writing pedagogy teacher development professional writing qualitative research digital rhetoric artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  2. Computers and Composition Mar 2026
    Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia ↗
    Zhang Kailin; Murad Abdu Saeed
    writing pedagogy revision qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  3. Journal of Writing Research Feb 2026
    Generative AI use in college writing classes: An analysis of student chat logs and writing projects ↗
    Sarah Madsen Hardy; Pary Fassihi; Shuang Geng; Christopher McVey; Matt Parfitt
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy artificial intelligence multilingual writers
  4. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    Unveiling the antecedents of feedback-seeking behavior in L2 writing: The impact of future L2 writing selves and emotions ↗
    Jia Li; Lawrence Jun Zhang
    writing pedagogy teacher development revision multilingual writers
  5. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    How reliable and valid is peer evaluation in adolescents’ L2 argumentative writing? ↗
    Albert W. Li; Steve Graham
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment multilingual writers grammar and mechanics literacy studies