Queering consent

Abstract

For decades, sexual violence prevention and sexual consent have been a recurrent topic on college campuses and in popular media, most recently because of the success of the #MeToo movement. As a result, institutions are deeply invested in communicating consent information. This article problematizes those institutional attempts to teach consent by comparing them to an alternative grounded in queer politics. This alternative information may provide a useful path to redesigning consent information by destabilizing categories of gender, sexuality, and even consent itself.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2019-08-26
DOI
10.1145/3358931.3358938
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Communication Design Quarterly
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Communication Design Quarterly
  4. Communication Design Quarterly

Cites in this index (19)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 19 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Communication Design Quarterly
  6. Communication Design Quarterly
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. Technical Communication Quarterly
  12. Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.00018.x
  2. 10.1177/0959353507072914
  3. May). Guest column: What does queer theory teach us about sex
    Publications of the Modern Language Association of America  
  4. 10.1086/448884
  5. 10.1177/1363460712454076
  6. 10.1215/10642684-3-4-437
  7. 10.1177/1540415318790554
  8. 10.1081/CRP-120021081
  9. 10.1177/0957926598009002002
  10. Ehrlich S. (2003). Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. New York NY: Routledge. Ehrlich S. (2003)…
  11. Farmer F. (2013). After the public turn: Composition counterpublics and the citizen bricoleur. Boulder CO: Un…
  12. 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00023.x
  13. 10.1598/RRQ.39.4.4
  14. 10.1177/1077801218790697
  15. 10.1080/00224490701586706
  16. 10.1080/00224499.2013.792326
  17. Jozkowski K. N. (2015). "Yes means yes"? Sexual consent policy and college students. Change: The Magazine of …
  18. 10.1080/07491409.2018.1470121
  19. 10.15195/v5.a19
  20. 10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162
  21. 10.1109/IPCC.2012.6408592
  22. 10.1080/01947648.2010.505835
  23. Martin P. Y. (2013). Rape work: Victims gender and emotions in organization and community context. New York N…
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186471
  25. 10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-43
  26. 10.1007/BF00160012
  27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67732-X
  28. 10.1145/3233756.3233931
  29. 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1056604
  30. 10.1080/01425692.2013.854596
  31. Smith A. (2015). Conquest: Sexual violence and American Indian genocide. Durham NC: Duke UP. Smith A. (2015)…
  32. 10.1353/lib.2006.0053
  33. 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.73
  34. 10.1080/07491409.2008.10162546
  35. 10.1080/14680770701824878
CrossRef global citation count: 22 View in citation network →