Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 2004

  1. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(05)00007-3
  2. Following Phaedrus: Alternate choices in surmounting the reliability/validity dilemma
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.10.001
  3. Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001
  4. A comparison of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in an analysis of college sophomore writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.11.001
  5. It's déjà vu all over again
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.08.001
  6. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(04)00031-5
  7. Ed. Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(05)00005-x

January 2003

  1. Assessing writing: Are we bound by only one method?
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00018-7
  2. Contents index for Volume 8
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00035-7
  3. Ed. Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00025-4
  4. L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.002
  5. Reading high stakes writing samples: My life as a reader
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.001
  6. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00027-8
  7. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.003
  8. Author Index for Volume 8
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00033-3

October 2002

  1. The scope of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00029-6
  2. Learner perspectives of success in an EAP writing course
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00032-6
  3. Assessing the Portfolio: Hamp-Lyons and Condon
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00033-8
  4. Introduction
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00030-2
  5. An assessment of ESL writing placement assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00028-4
  6. Developing a performance-based assessment of students’ critical thinking skills
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00031-4

January 2002

  1. A book that delivers more than it promises: Sarah Cushing Weigle’s Assessing Writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00004-7
  2. Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is “success”?
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00002-3
  3. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00010-2
  4. Language proficiency assessment for teachers: The effects of benchmarking on writing assessment in Hong Kong schools
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00048-x
  5. Assessing L2 writing: Alternative constructs and ethical dilemmas
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00047-8
  6. Ed. Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00008-4
  7. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00014-x
  8. A comparison of composing processes and written products in timed-essay tests across paper-and-pencil and computer modes
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00003-5
  9. Publisher's Note
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00013-8

May 2000

  1. Sequel or Prequel? Son of Cooper and Odell Takes Us Back in Time
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00022-2
  2. Author Index to Volume 7
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)00027-7
  3. Contents Index to Volume 7
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)00026-5
  4. doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)00025-3
  5. Rhetoric and the writer's profile
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00020-9
  6. The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00012-x
  7. Students' conditioned response to teachers' response: portfolio proponents, take note!
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00021-0

February 2000

  1. A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room?
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00019-2
  2. Introduction
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00014-3
  3. Response and the social construction of error
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00015-5
  4. Responding to the invisible student
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00016-7
  5. Cyrano's nose: Variations on the theme of response
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00018-0
  6. The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00017-9

January 1999

  1. The development of large-scale portfolio placement assessment at the University of Michigan: 1992–1998
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00006-9
  2. Reviewers for volume 6
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)80003-9
  3. Contents index to volume 6 number 1,1999
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)80002-7
  4. Changes in secondary teachers' perceptions of barriers to portfolio assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00004-5
  5. All done with the best of intentions: one Kentucky high school after six years of state portfolio tests
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00005-7
  6. Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and qualitative approaches
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00010-6
  7. Reading the invisible ink: Assessing the responses of non-composition faculty
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00007-6