Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 1999

  1. Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00003-3
  2. Exploring the theories and consequences of self-assessment through ethical inquiry
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00008-8
  3. Introduction
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00013-1
  4. About the authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)90001-6
  5. Author index to volume 6
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)80001-5
  6. An Overview of Writing Assessment: Theory, Research, and Practice
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00011-8
  7. From the editors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00007-0
  8. Grading Student Writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00002-1

January 1998

  1. Multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80007-5
  2. Learning from research in assessment: A response to writing assessment—raters' elaboration of the rating task
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80004-x
  3. From the editors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80011-7
  4. About the authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90005-8
  5. Reviewing books on grading: Should I respond, assess, evaluate, or grade?
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80015-4
  6. It was the best of times. it was a waste of time: university of kentucky students' views of writing under KERA
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80012-9
  7. Interrater reliability in a california middle school english/language arts portfolio assessment program
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80013-0
  8. Rubrics, prototypes, and exemplars: Categorization theory and systems of writing placement
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80014-2
  9. A question of choice: The implications of assessing expressive writing in multiple genres
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80005-1
  10. Reviewers for volume 5
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90007-1
  11. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90001-0
  12. About the authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90003-4
  13. Index to volume 5
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80016-6
  14. Introduction to special issue
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80002-6
  15. Commentary on “validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative writing of middle school students”
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80010-5
  16. Writing assessment: Raters' elaboration of the rating task
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80003-8
  17. From the editors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80001-4
  18. Direct assessments of writing: Substance and romance
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80006-3
  19. Testing the test of the test: A response to “multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests”
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80008-7
  20. Validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative writing of middle school students
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80009-9

January 1997

  1. From the editors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80008-6
  2. Taking time out from grading and evaluating while working in a conventional system
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80003-7
  3. Thirteen ways of looking at a bluebook
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80007-4
  4. Reviewers for volume 4
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80015-3
  5. Calling writers' bluffs: The social production of writing ability in university placement-testing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80005-0
  6. The relationship between essay reading style and scoring proficiency in a psychometric scoring system
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80006-2
  7. Reciprocal authorities in communal writing assessment: Constructing textual value within a “New politics of inquiry”
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80010-4
  8. Stories of reading: Inside and outside the texts of portfolios
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80009-8
  9. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80001-3
  10. Effects of writing instruction and assessment on functional composition performance
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80012-8
  11. Assessing writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80014-1
  12. Portfolio assessment: A catalyst for staff and curricular reform
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80004-9
  13. From the editors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80002-5
  14. Portfolios on the precipice
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80013-x
  15. Expanding the dialogue on culture as a critical component when assessing writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80011-6

January 1996

  1. The college application essay: A rhetorical paradox
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90005-7
  2. Reviewers for volume 3
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90020-3
  3. Blessings and curses: Theorizing, defending, and practicing writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90006-9
  4. About the authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90007-0
  5. About the authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90017-3
  6. Review of twelve readers reading
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90014-8
  7. One book: Three reviews
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(96)90013-6