Assessing Writing
1019 articles
Search
Year:
From…
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
–
To…
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
Topic:
All topics…
assessment (279)
multilingual writers (150)
editorial matter (115)
writing pedagogy (61)
teacher development (57)
book reviews (54)
literacy studies (43)
revision (33)
argument (31)
artificial intelligence (31)
grammar and mechanics (30)
genre theory (29)
digital rhetoric (20)
qualitative research (19)
portfolios (18)
empirical research (15)
affect and writing (14)
race and writing (14)
discourse analysis (9)
graduate education (9)
gender and writing (7)
rhetorical criticism (7)
collaborative writing (6)
multimodality (6)
online writing instruction (5)
first-year composition (4)
technical communication (3)
modern rhetorical theory (2)
peer tutoring (2)
translingualism (2)
writing across the curriculum (2)
basic writing (1)
creative writing (1)
professional writing (1)
quantitative research (1)
scientific writing (1)
voice and style (1)
writing program administration (1)
Apply
Export:
BibTeX
RIS
May 2000
May 2000
Author Index to Volume 7
↗
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)00027-7
May 2000
Contents Index to Volume 7
↗
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)00026-5
May 2000
↗
Brian Huot; Kathleen Blake Yancey
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)00025-3
May 2000
Rhetoric and the writer's profile
↗
Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson; Jeff Sommers; John Paul Tassoni
rhetorical criticism
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00020-9
May 2000
The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability
↗
Jim Penny; Robert L Johnson; Belita Gordon
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00012-x
May 2000
Students' conditioned response to teachers' response: portfolio proponents, take note!
↗
S. Richardson
portfolios
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00021-0
February 2000
Feb 2000
A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: Is there a student in the room?
↗
Sandra Murphy
teacher development
revision
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00019-2
Feb 2000
Introduction
↗
Peggy O'Neill
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00014-3
Feb 2000
Response and the social construction of error
↗
Chris M. Anson
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00015-5
Feb 2000
Responding to the invisible student
↗
Susan Callahan
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00016-7
Feb 2000
Cyrano's nose: Variations on the theme of response
↗
LouiseWetherbee Phelps
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00018-0
Feb 2000
The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response
↗
Richard Straub
teacher development
revision
qualitative research
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00017-9
January 1999
Jan 1999
The development of large-scale portfolio placement assessment at the University of Michigan: 1992–1998
↗
Margaret Willard-Traub; Emily Decker; Rebecca Reed; Jerome Johnston
assessment
portfolios
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00006-9
Jan 1999
Reviewers for volume 6
↗
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)80003-9
Jan 1999
Contents index to volume 6 number 1,1999
↗
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)80002-7
Jan 1999
Changes in secondary teachers' perceptions of barriers to portfolio assessment
↗
Edward W. Wolfe; Chris W.T. Chiu; Mark D. Reckase
assessment
portfolios
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00004-5
Jan 1999
All done with the best of intentions: one Kentucky high school after six years of state portfolio tests
↗
Susan Callahan
portfolios
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00005-7
Jan 1999
Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and qualitative approaches
↗
Sara Cushing Weigle
assessment
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00010-6
Jan 1999
Reading the invisible ink: Assessing the responses of non-composition faculty
↗
Francie Jeffery; Bonita Selting
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00007-6
Jan 1999
OA PDF
Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing
↗
John A. Ross; Carol Rolheiser; Anne Hogaboam-Gray
assessment
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00003-3
Jan 1999
Exploring the theories and consequences of self-assessment through ethical inquiry
↗
Ellen Schendel; Peggy O'neill
assessment
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00008-8
Jan 1999
Introduction
↗
Brian Huot
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00013-1
Jan 1999
About the authors
↗
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)90001-6
Jan 1999
Author index to volume 6
↗
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(01)80001-5
Jan 1999
An Overview of Writing Assessment: Theory, Research, and Practice
↗
Nancy Blattner
assessment
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00011-8
Jan 1999
From the editors
↗
Brian Huot; Kathleen Blake Yancey
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00007-0
Jan 1999
Grading Student Writing
↗
Richard H. Haswell
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00002-1
January 1998
Jan 1998
Multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests
↗
Richard H. Haswell
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80007-5
Jan 1998
Learning from research in assessment: A response to writing assessment—raters' elaboration of the rating task
↗
Harry Torrance
revision
assessment
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80004-x
Jan 1998
From the editors
↗
Kathleen Blake Yancey; Brian Huot
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80011-7
Jan 1998
About the authors
↗
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90005-8
Jan 1998
Reviewing books on grading: Should I respond, assess, evaluate, or grade?
↗
Thomas Hilgers
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80015-4
Jan 1998
It was the best of times. it was a waste of time: university of kentucky students' views of writing under KERA
↗
Elizabeth Spalding; Gail Cummins
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80012-9
Jan 1998
Interrater reliability in a california middle school english/language arts portfolio assessment program
↗
Terry Underwood; Sandra Murphy
assessment
portfolios
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80013-0
Jan 1998
Rubrics, prototypes, and exemplars: Categorization theory and systems of writing placement
↗
Richard H. Haswell
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80014-2
Jan 1998
A question of choice: The implications of assessing expressive writing in multiple genres
↗
Gail Lynn Goldberg; Barbara Sherr Roswell; Hillary Michaels
genre theory
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80005-1
Jan 1998
Reviewers for volume 5
↗
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90007-1
Jan 1998
Editorial Board
↗
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90001-0
Jan 1998
About the authors
↗
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(98)90003-4
Jan 1998
Index to volume 5
↗
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80016-6
Jan 1998
Introduction to special issue
↗
William L. Smith
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80002-6
Jan 1998
Commentary on “validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative writing of middle school students”
↗
Robert J. Bracewell
argument
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80010-5
Jan 1998
Writing assessment: Raters' elaboration of the rating task
↗
Mary L. DeRemer
assessment
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80003-8
Jan 1998
From the editors
↗
Brian Huot; Kathleen Blake Yancey
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80001-4
Jan 1998
Direct assessments of writing: Substance and romance
↗
Roger D. Cherry; Stephen P. Witte
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80006-3
Jan 1998
Testing the test of the test: A response to “multiple inquiry in the validation of writing tests”
↗
Pamela A. Moss
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80008-7
Jan 1998
Validation of a scheme for assessing argumentative writing of middle school students
↗
Stuart S. Yeh
argument
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80009-9
January 1997
Jan 1997
From the editors
↗
Kathleen Blake Yancey; Brian Huot
editorial matter
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80008-6
Jan 1997
Taking time out from grading and evaluating while working in a conventional system
↗
Peter Elbow
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80003-7
Jan 1997
Thirteen ways of looking at a bluebook
↗
Richard Haswell
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80007-4
← Previous
Page 19 of 21
Next →