Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

April 2024

  1. Is CJ a valid, reliable form of L2 writing assessment when texts are long, homogeneous in proficiency, and feature heterogeneous prompts?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100843
  2. Writing assessment and feedback literacy: Where do we stand and where can we go?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100829
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100831

January 2024

  1. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100816
  2. Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer review and revision in writing-to-learn
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808
  3. Do I need feedback or avoid it in L2 writing? Impacts of self-efficacy and shyness on feedback-seeking behavior
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100805
  4. Noun phrase complexity and second language Chinese proficiency: An analysis of narratives by Korean learners of Chinese
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100810
  5. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100814
  6. Reading the reader through raciolinguistic ideologies: An investigation of the evidence students present in self- placement
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100792
  7. Amplifying test-taker voices in the validation of L2 writing assessment tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100790
  8. A mixed Rasch model analysis of multiple profiles in L2 writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100803
  9. The motivational aspect of feedback: A meta-analysis on the effect of different feedback practices on L2 learners’ writing motivation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100802
  10. Unlocking writing success: Building assessment literacy for students and teachers through effective interventions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100804
  11. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(24)00014-x
  12. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100807
  13. Assessing metacognition-based student feedback literacy for academic writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100811
  14. Effects of errors on ratings of writing performances – Evidence from a high-stakes exam
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100806

October 2023

  1. Profiling support in literacy development: Use of natural language processing to identify learning needs in higher education
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100787
  2. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100793
  3. Assessing Korean writing ability through a scenario-based assessment approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100766
  4. Student engagement with peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from reflective journaling and revising practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100784
  5. Growth mindset and emotions in tandem: Their effects on L2 writing performance based on writers’ proficiency levels
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100785
  6. Feedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF research agendas
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786
  7. Insights from lexical and syntactic analyses of a French for academic purposes assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100789
  8. Understanding EFL students’ feedback literacy development in academic writing: A longitudinal case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100770
  9. The effects of task complexity and language aptitude on EFL learners’ writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100791
  10. Automated analysis of cohesive features in L2 writing: Examining effects of task complexity and task repetition
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100783
  11. Developments in learners’ affective engagement with written peer feedback: The affordances of in situ translanguaging
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100788
  12. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(23)00105-8
  13. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100782

July 2023

  1. Peer-feedback of an occluded genre in the Spanish language classroom: A case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100756
  2. Diagnosing Chinese college-level English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ integrated writing capability: A Log-linear Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (LCDM) study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100730
  3. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100772
  4. Use of lexical features in high-stakes tests: Evidence from the perspectives of complexity, accuracy and fluency
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100758
  5. Developing feedback literacy through dialogue-supported performances of multi-draft writing in a postgraduate class
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100759
  6. Feedback seeking by first-year Chinese international students: Understanding practices and challenges
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100757
  7. A non-Western adaptation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES)
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100763
  8. Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752
  9. The development of teacher feedback literacy in situ: EFL writing teachers’ endeavor to human-computer-AWE integral feedback innovation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739
  10. Predicting EFL expository writing quality with measures of lexical richness
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100762
  11. Beyond literacy and competency – The effects of raters’ perceived uncertainty on assessment of writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100768
  12. Assessing source use: Summary vs. reading-to-write argumentative essay
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100755
  13. Are self-compassionate writers more feedback literate? Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of feedback constructiveness
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100761
  14. Classroom writing assessment and feedback practices: A new materialist encounter
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100760
  15. Developing EFL teachers’ feedback literacy for research and publication purposes through intra- and inter-disciplinary collaborations: A multiple-case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100751
  16. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100729
  17. Editorial Introduction – AI, corpora, and future directions for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100769
  18. Exploring new insights into the role of cohesive devices in written academic genres
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100749
  19. Investigating the dimensions and determinants of children’s narrative writing in Korean
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100740
  20. Assessing writing in fourth grade: Rhetorical specification effects on text quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100764