Resistance as Participation: Queer Theory’s Applications for HIV Health Technology Design

McKinley Green University of Minnesota System

Abstract

This article proposes resistance as a form of participation in user experience settings. It details a study to include people living with HIV in codesigning a health education technology, and it found that participants resisted online education initiatives, citing HIV stigma on social media and privacy concerns. Taken with queer theory, these findings underscore the offline inequities mediating interaction on social media for those living with HIV and open alternative design arrangements reflecting participants’ embodied experiences.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2021-10-02
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2020.1831615
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1215/9780822373711-013
  2. 10.1145/2470654.2466446
  3. 10.1145/3358931.3358935
  4. 10.1353/hpu.2005.0077
  5. 10.1177/0963662509347814
  6. 10.1037/13620-004
  7. 10.1177/1461444814542311
  8. 10.1162/074793601750357178
  9. 10.18061/dsq.v36i4.5325
  10. 10.1177/1461444817744784
  11. 10.1017/S1742058X04040044
  12. 10.1136/medethics-2015-102781
  13. 10.1145/3121283.3121301
  14. 10.7330/9781607327585.c000
  15. 10.1007/s11904-015-0280-x
  16. 10.1007/s10912-014-9275-7
  17. 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.07.007
  18. 10.2196/jmir.3311
  19. 10.1023/A:1016846402426
  20. 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-79
  21. 10.1145/3131201.3131203
  22. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.026
  23. 10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
  24. 10.1145/3233756.3233931
  25. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2656698
  26. 10.1145/1738826.1738829
  27. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.019
  28. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
  29. 10.21310/cnx.4.1.16wal
  30. 10.1145/2524248.2524257
CrossRef global citation count: 19 View in citation network →