Integrating Critical Approaches to Technology and Service-Learning Projects

Melinda Turnley DePaul University

Abstract

Discussions of service learning emphasize opportunities for students to gain real world experience through work in community contexts. Less attention, however, has been given to the role of technology in these projects. Incorporating critical reflection on the rhetorical and social dimensions of technology throughout students' collaborations with clients can help to situate their practices within larger public contexts. This sort of reflection can encourage student engagement on a variety of levels: professional, rhetorical, intellectual, personal, and civic.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1601_6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (43) · 18 in this index

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Bowdon, M. & Scott, J. B. (2003). Service-learning in technical and professional communication. San Francisco…
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 43 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning
  3. Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  4. Feenberg, A. (1995). Subversive rationalization: Technology, power, and democracy. In A. Feenberg & A. Hannay…
  5. Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Computers and Composition
  9. Hansen, C. J. (1996). Contextualizing technology and communication in a corporate setting. In A. H. Duin & C.…
  10. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
  11. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest witness@second_millennium.femalemanc_meets_oncomouse . New York: Routledge.
  12. Henry, J. (2000). Writing workplace cultures: An archaeology of professional writing. Carbondale: Southern Il…
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. Technical Communication Quarterly
  16. Johnson-Eilola, J. (1997). Wild technologies: Computer use and social responsibility. In S. A. Selber (Ed.), …
  17. Technical Communication Quarterly
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Kimme Hea, A. C. (2005). What's at stake? Strategies for developing stakeholder relationships in service-lear…
  20. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  21. Lay, M. M. (2000). Technical communication. In L. K. Shamoon, R. Moore Howard, S. Jamieson, & R. A. Schwegler…
  22. Technical Communication Quarterly
  23. Meyer, P. R. & Bernhardt, S. A. (1997). Workplace realities and the technical communication curriculum: A cal…
  24. JAC
  25. Rude, C. (Ed.). (2004). The state of technical communication in its academic context [Special issue]. Technic…
  26. Technical Communication Quarterly
  27. Selber, S. A. (1997). Hypertext spheres of influence in technical communication instructional contexts. In S.…
  28. Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  29. 10.2307/358859
  30. Selfe, R. (2004). Learning with students: Technology autobiographies in the classroom. In T. Bridgeford, K. K…
  31. Slack, J. D. (1989). Contextualizing technology. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Ed…
  32. 10.1177/108056999605900304
    Business Communication Quarterly  
  33. Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, …
  34. JAC
  35. 10.1177/108056999806100211
    Business Communication Quarterly  
  36. Computers and Composition
  37. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  38. Technical Communication Quarterly