Assessing Writing Jul 2014

Assembling validity evidence for assessing academic writing: Rater reactions to integrated tasks

Atta Gebril ; Lia Plakans
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2014-07-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Lee et al. (2025)
    Predicting inappropriate source use from scores of language use, source compreh…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Karakoҫ et al. (2025)
    Designing a rating scale for an integrated reading-writing test: A needs-orient…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Harsch et al. (2024)
    Validating an integrated reading-into-writing scale with trained university students
    Assessing Writing
  4. Xie (2023)
    Assessing source use: Summary vs. reading-to-write argumentative essay
    Assessing Writing
  5. Uludag et al. (2022)
    Validating a rubric for assessing integrated writing in an EAP context
    Assessing Writing
Show all 10 →
  1. Kyle (2020)
    The relationship between features of source text use and integrated writing quality
    Assessing Writing
  2. Homayounzadeh et al. (2019)
    Investigating the effect of source characteristics on task comparability in int…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Ohta et al. (2018)
    Integrated writing scores based on holistic and multi-trait scales: A generaliz…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Chan et al. (2015)
    Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study
    Assessing Writing
  5. Ewert et al. (2015)
    Examining instructors’ conceptualizations and challenges in designing a data-dr…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Plakans et al. (2012)
    A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks
    Assessing Writing
  2. Gebril (2010)
    Bringing reading-to-write and writing-only assessment tasks together: A general…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Plakans (2008)
    Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks
    Assessing Writing
  4. DeRemer (1998)
    Writing assessment: Raters' elaboration of the rating task
    Assessing Writing
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. Barkaoui (2011)
    Think-aloud protocols in research on essay rating: An empirical study of their veridicali…
    Language Testing  ↗
  2. Brown (1991)
    Do English and ESL faculties rate writing samples differently?
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  3. Cumming (1990)
    Expertise in evaluating second language compositions
    Language Testing  ↗
  4. Cumming (2002)
    Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework
    The Modern Language Journal  ↗
  5. Douglas (1994)
    Quantity and quality in speaking test performance
    Language Testing  ↗
  6. Douglas (1992)
    Analyzing oral proficiency test performance in general and specific-purpose contexts
    System  ↗
  7. Gebril (2009)
    Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all?
    Journal of Language Testing  ↗
  8. Gebril (2013)
    Towards a transparent construct of reading-to-write assessment tasks: The interface betwe…
    Language Assessment Quarterly  ↗
  9. Horowitz (1986)
    What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  10. Lumley (2002)
    Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters?
    Language Testing  ↗
  11. Pennycook (1996)
    Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism
    TESOL Quarterly  ↗
  12. Plakans (2009)
    Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment
    Language Testing  ↗
  13. Schoonen (1997)
    The assessment of writing ability: Expert readers versus lay readers
    Language Testing  ↗
  14. Shohamy (1992)
    The effect of raters’ background and training on the reliability of direct writing tests
    Modern Language Journal  ↗
  15. Song (1996)
    Do English and ESL faculty differ in evaluating the essays of native English-speaking and…
    Journal of Second Language Writing  ↗
  16. Weigle (1994)
    Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions
    Language Testing  ↗
  17. Weigle (1998)
    Using FACETS to model rater training effects
    Language Testing  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 44 View in citation network →