Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

October 2015

  1. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(15)00032-x
  2. Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002
  3. Understanding variations between student and teacher application of rubrics
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.003
  4. Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.004
  5. Examining instructors’ conceptualizations and challenges in designing a data-driven rating scale for a reading-to-write task
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.001
  6. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.08.001
  7. Keeping up with the times: Revising and refreshing a rating scale
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.001

July 2015

  1. “I must impress the raters!” An investigation of Chinese test-takers’ strategies to manage rater impressions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.001
  2. In this issue…
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.003
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.002
  4. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(15)00021-5
  5. Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001
  6. ESL essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the Jacobs et al. rubric: An eye-movement study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.002

April 2015

  1. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(15)00009-4
  2. Predicting EFL writing ability from levels of mental representation measured by Coh-Metrix: A structural equation modeling study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.03.001
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.12.001
  4. Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
  5. A new approach towards marking large-scale complex assessments: Developing a distributed marking system that uses an automatically scaffolding and rubric-targeted interface for guided peer-review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.11.001
  6. Connecting writing and language in assessment: Examining style, tone, and argument in the U.S. Common Core standards and in exemplary student writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.03.002
  7. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.03.003

January 2015

  1. Ideological and linguistic values in EFL examination scripts: The selection and execution of story genres
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.001
  2. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(14)00057-9
  3. An evaluation of the Writing Assessment Measure (WAM) for children's narrative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.001
  4. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.11.002
  5. Toward a validational framework using student course papers from common undergraduate curricular requirements as viable outcomes evidence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.10.001
  6. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.005
  7. A hierarchical classification approach to automated essay scoring
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.002

October 2014

  1. Reflexive writers: Re-thinking writing development and assessment in schools
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.002
  2. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(14)00048-8
  3. On the vulnerability of automated scoring to construct-irrelevant response strategies (CIRS): An illustration
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.06.001
  4. Thank you to reviewers, 2013
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.004
  5. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.07.001
  6. Just Ask Teachers: Building expertise, trusting subjectivity, and valuing difference in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.06.002
  7. Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
  8. Contexts of engagement: Towards developing a model for implementing and evaluating a writing across the curriculum programme in the sciences
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.005
  9. Three current, interconnected concerns for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.003
  10. The challenges of emulating human behavior in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.07.002
  11. Examining genre effects on test takers’ summary writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.003

July 2014

  1. The three-fold benefit of reflective writing: Improving program assessment, student learning, and faculty professional development
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001
  2. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.05.002
  3. Development and validation of a scale to measure perceived authenticity in writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.001
  4. Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003
  5. Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001
  6. When “the state of the art” is counting words
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.05.001
  7. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(14)00027-0
  8. The WPA Outcomes Statement, validation, and the pursuit of localism
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.004
  9. Assembling validity evidence for assessing academic writing: Rater reactions to integrated tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.002

April 2014

  1. Measures matter: Evidence of faculty development effects on faculty and student learning
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.12.001
  2. State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001
  3. Pair assessment of pupil writing: A dialogic approach for studying the development of rater competence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.002