Assessing Writing

1018 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

October 2017

  1. Student and instructor perceptions of writing tasks and performance on TOEFL iBT versus university writing courses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.004
  2. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(17)30043-0
  3. Assessing C2 writing ability on the Certificate of English Language Proficiency: Rater and examinee age effects
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.004
  4. Exploring the relationship between textual characteristics and rating quality in rater-mediated writing assessments: An illustration with L1 and L2 writing assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.003
  5. College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002
  6. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.002
  7. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.001
  8. EDITORIAL FOR ASSESSING WRITING VOL 34
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.001

July 2017

  1. Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001
  2. Evaluating rater accuracy and perception for integrated writing assessments using a mixed-methods approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.003
  3. The TOEFL iBT writing: Korean students’ perceptions of the TOEFL iBT writing test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.02.001
  4. Similarities and differences in constructs represented by U.S. States’ middle school writing tests and the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.06.001
  5. Editorial for ASSESSING WRITING Vol 33 2017
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.001
  6. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(17)30029-6
  7. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.06.002
  8. Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004
  9. Tools and Tech: A New Forum
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.06.003

April 2017

  1. To make a long story short: A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.004
  2. Textual voice elements and voice strength in EFL argumentative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.02.002
  3. Improvement of writing skills during college: A multi-year cross-sectional and longitudinal study of undergraduate writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.11.001
  4. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(17)30009-0
  5. Checking assumed proficiency: Comparing L1 and L2 performance on a university entrance test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.005
  6. The effectiveness of instructor feedback for learning-oriented language assessment: Using an integrated reading-to-write task for English for academic purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.001
  7. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.005
  8. Placement of multilingual writers: Is there a role for student voices?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.10.001
  9. Validation of a locally created and rated writing test used for placement in a higher education EFL program
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.09.002

January 2017

  1. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.003
  2. Narrative and expository genre effects on students, raters, and performance criteria
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.006
  3. Call for papers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.002
  4. Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedback in a Learning Management System
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.003
  5. Are TOEFL iBT® writing test scores related to keyboard type? A survey of keyboard-related practices at testing centers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.04.001
  6. Voice in timed L2 argumentative essay writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.004
  7. Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.003
  8. How students' ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.002
  9. “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
  10. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30075-7
  11. K-12 multimodal assessment and interactive audiences: An exploratory analysis of existing frameworks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.005
  12. Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.005
  13. Thank you to reviewers, 2016
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.006

October 2016

  1. Development and initial argument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writing electronic portfolios
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.001
  2. “I can see that”: Developing shared rubric category interpretations through score negotiation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.001
  3. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30055-1
  4. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.002
  5. “Voice” in children’s science arguments: Aligning assessment criteria with genre and discipline
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.004
  6. Innovation in rubric use: Exploring different dimensions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.09.001
  7. Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003
  8. A Many-Facet Rasch analysis comparing essay rater behavior on an academic English reading/writing test used for two purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.004

July 2016

  1. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30025-3
  2. Searching for differences and discovering similarities: Why international and resident second-language learners’ grammatical errors cannot serve as a proxy for placement into writing courses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.001
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.002