Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

April 2017

  1. Textual voice elements and voice strength in EFL argumentative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.02.002
  2. Improvement of writing skills during college: A multi-year cross-sectional and longitudinal study of undergraduate writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.11.001
  3. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(17)30009-0
  4. Checking assumed proficiency: Comparing L1 and L2 performance on a university entrance test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.005
  5. The effectiveness of instructor feedback for learning-oriented language assessment: Using an integrated reading-to-write task for English for academic purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.001
  6. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.005
  7. Placement of multilingual writers: Is there a role for student voices?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.10.001
  8. Validation of a locally created and rated writing test used for placement in a higher education EFL program
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.09.002

January 2017

  1. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.003
  2. Narrative and expository genre effects on students, raters, and performance criteria
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.006
  3. Call for papers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.002
  4. Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedback in a Learning Management System
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.003
  5. Are TOEFL iBT® writing test scores related to keyboard type? A survey of keyboard-related practices at testing centers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.04.001
  6. Voice in timed L2 argumentative essay writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.004
  7. Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.003
  8. How students' ability levels influence the relevance and accuracy of their feedback to peers: A case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.002
  9. “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
  10. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30075-7
  11. K-12 multimodal assessment and interactive audiences: An exploratory analysis of existing frameworks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.005
  12. Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.005
  13. Thank you to reviewers, 2016
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.006

October 2016

  1. Development and initial argument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writing electronic portfolios
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.001
  2. “I can see that”: Developing shared rubric category interpretations through score negotiation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.001
  3. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30055-1
  4. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.002
  5. “Voice” in children’s science arguments: Aligning assessment criteria with genre and discipline
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.004
  6. Innovation in rubric use: Exploring different dimensions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.09.001
  7. Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003
  8. A Many-Facet Rasch analysis comparing essay rater behavior on an academic English reading/writing test used for two purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.004

July 2016

  1. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30025-3
  2. Searching for differences and discovering similarities: Why international and resident second-language learners’ grammatical errors cannot serve as a proxy for placement into writing courses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.001
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.002
  4. Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002
  5. Farewell to holistic scoring. Part Two: Why build a house with only one brick?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.006
  6. Awaiting a new wave: The status of state writing assessment in the United States
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.003

April 2016

  1. Describing and interpreting graphs: The relationships between undergraduate writer characteristics and academic graph writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.02.002
  2. Developing an individual and collective self-efficacy scale for the teaching of writing in high schools
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.01.001
  3. Writing assessment literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.03.001
  4. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(16)30006-x
  5. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.01.002
  6. Comparing writing performance in TOEFL-iBT and academic assignments: An exploration of textual features
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.02.001

January 2016

  1. Thank you to reviewers, 2014
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.12.001
  2. Native and Iranian teachers’ perceptions and evaluation of Iranian students’ English essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.10.001
  3. Comparing the accuracy of different scoring methods for identifying sixth graders at risk of failing a state writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.003
  4. Same text different processing? Exploring how raters’ cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies influence rating accuracy in essay scoring
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.11.001
  5. Features of difficult-to-score essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.002
  6. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(15)00047-1
  7. Farewell to Holistic Scoring?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.12.002
  8. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.10.002

October 2015

  1. Dance, ten; looks, three: Why rubrics matter
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.08.002