Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

October 2018

  1. Integrated writing scores based on holistic and multi-trait scales: A generalizability analysis
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.08.001
  2. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.10.001
  3. Assessing writing with the tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES)
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.004
  4. Connecting writing assessment with critical thinking: An exploratory study of alternative rhetorical functions and objects of enquiry in writing prompts
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.09.001

July 2018

  1. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(18)30120-x
  2. Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001
  3. Not to scale? An argument-based inquiry into the validity of an L2 writing rating scale
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.01.001
  4. Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students’ writing performances across two European countries
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009
  5. From assessing to teaching writing: What teachers prioritize
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.003
  6. Modeling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002
  7. Writing from sources: Does audience matter?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.004
  8. EDITORIAL
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.001

April 2018

  1. Examining the comparability between paper- and computer-based versions of an integrated writing placement test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.006
  2. Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004
  3. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(18)30054-0
  4. Show me your true colours: Scaffolding formative academic literacy assessment through an online learning platform
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.005
  5. Paper-based vs computer-based writing assessment: divergent, equivalent or complementary?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.04.001
  6. Researching the comparability of paper-based and computer-based delivery in a high-stakes writing test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.008
  7. The effects of writing mode and computer ability on L2 test-takers' essay characteristics and scores
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.005
  8. Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support assessment for learning of L2 writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.007
  9. Going online: The effect of mode of delivery on performances and perceptions on an English L2 writing test suite
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.003

January 2018

  1. Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
  2. Call for papers 25 th Anniversary Themed Issue: Framing the Future of Writing Assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.002
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.001
  4. Examining the validity of an analytic rating scale for a Spanish test for academic purposes using the argument-based approach to validation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.003
  5. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(18)30007-2
  6. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.001
  7. Effects of indirect coded corrective feedback with and without short affective teacher comments on L2 writing performance, learner uptake and motivation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.002
  8. From independent ratings to communal ratings: A study of CWA raters’ decision-making behaviors
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.004

October 2017

  1. Integrating assessment as , for , and of learning in a large-scale exam preparation course
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.003
  2. Design and evaluation of automated writing evaluation models: Relationships with writing in naturalistic settings
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.001
  3. Automated formative writing assessment using a levels of language framework
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.002
  4. Student and instructor perceptions of writing tasks and performance on TOEFL iBT versus university writing courses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.004
  5. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(17)30043-0
  6. Assessing C2 writing ability on the Certificate of English Language Proficiency: Rater and examinee age effects
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.004
  7. Exploring the relationship between textual characteristics and rating quality in rater-mediated writing assessments: An illustration with L1 and L2 writing assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.003
  8. College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002
  9. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.002
  10. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.09.001
  11. EDITORIAL FOR ASSESSING WRITING VOL 34
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.001

July 2017

  1. Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001
  2. Evaluating rater accuracy and perception for integrated writing assessments using a mixed-methods approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.003
  3. The TOEFL iBT writing: Korean students’ perceptions of the TOEFL iBT writing test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.02.001
  4. Similarities and differences in constructs represented by U.S. States’ middle school writing tests and the 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.06.001
  5. Editorial for ASSESSING WRITING Vol 33 2017
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.08.001
  6. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(17)30029-6
  7. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.06.002
  8. Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004
  9. Tools and Tech: A New Forum
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.06.003

April 2017

  1. To make a long story short: A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.004