Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 2020

  1. Assessing the lexical richness of figurative expressions in Taiwanese EFL learners’ writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.007
  2. Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439
  3. Marrying achievement with proficiency – Developing and validating a local CEFR-based writing checklist
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100433
  4. Corrigendum to “The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays” [Assess. Writ. 39 (2019) 50–63]
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100448
  5. Linking TOEFL iBT® writing rubrics to CEFR levels: Cut scores and validity evidence from a standard setting study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100420
  6. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(20)30005-2
  7. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100447

October 2019

  1. Reflecting on the past, embracing the future
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100423
  2. Complexity, consequence, and frames: A quarter century of research in Assessing Writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100424
  3. Evidence of fairness: Twenty-five years of research in Assessing Writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100418
  4. Making our invisible racial agendas visible: Race talk in Assessing Writing, 1994–2018
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100425
  5. Unresolved issues in defining and assessing writing motivational constructs: A review of conceptualization and measurement perspectives
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100417
  6. (Re)visiting twenty-five years of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100419
  7. Editorial: 25 Years of Assessing Writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100422
  8. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(19)30170-9
  9. What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Writing (2000–2018)
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100421

July 2019

  1. Directed self-placement as a tool to foreground student agency
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.001
  2. Writing placement tools: Constructing and understanding students’ transition into college writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.005
  3. Using the Smarter Balanced grade 11 summative assessment in college writing placement
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.002
  4. Investigating the effect of source characteristics on task comparability in integrated writing tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.05.003
  5. Affordances and limitations of the ACCUPLACER automated writing placement tool
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.004
  6. Affordances of TOEFL writing tasks beyond university admissions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.006
  7. Error analysis and diagnosis of ESL linguistic accuracy: Construct specification and empirical validation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.05.002
  8. Holistic, local, and process-oriented: What makes the University Utah’s Writing Placement Exam work
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.003
  9. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.06.008
  10. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(19)30113-8
  11. Raters’ perceptions of assessment criteria relevance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.04.002
  12. Lower English proficiency means poorer feedback performance? A mixed-methods study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.05.001

April 2019

  1. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(19)30050-9
  2. “I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.003
  3. Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master's students in the Macau EFL context
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004
  4. Developing and examining validity evidence for the Writing Rubric to Inform Teacher Educators (WRITE)
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.001
  5. Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.002
  6. Editorial - volume 40
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.04.001

January 2019

  1. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.01.001
  2. A validation program for the Self-Beliefs, Writing-Beliefs, and Attitude Survey: A measure of adolescents' motivation toward writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.004
  3. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.01.002
  4. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(19)30011-x
  5. The influence of lexical features on teacher judgements of ESL argumentative essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.003
  6. An investigation of the text features of discrepantly-scored ESL essays: A mixed methods study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.10.003
  7. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.10.002
  8. Source use in the story continuation writing task
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.001
  9. Exploring the correspondence between traditional score resolution methods and person fit indices in rater-mediated writing assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.12.002
  10. Quantity and quality of uptake: Examining surface and meaning-level feedback provided by peers and an instructor in a graduate research course
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.11.001

October 2018

  1. Contract grading in the technical writing classroom: Blending community-based assessment and self-assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.002
  2. Corrigendum to “Modeling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing” [Assess. Writ. 37C (2018) 39–56]
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.09.002
  3. Corpus analytic tools: Constructing and understanding student writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.006
  4. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(18)30193-4
  5. The BAWE corpus and genre families classification of assessed student writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.005
  6. Teaching textual awareness with DocuScope: Using corpus-driven tools and reflection to support students’ written decision-making
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.003