Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

April 2021

  1. “I even feel annoyed and angry”: Teacher emotional experiences in giving feedback on student writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100528
  2. An integrated mixed-methods study of contract grading's impact on adolescents' perceptions of stress in high school English: a pilot study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100508
  3. Easing stress: Contract grading’s impact on adolescents’ perceptions of workload demands, time constraints, and challenge appraisal in high school English
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100526
  4. Directed Self-Placement: Subconstructs and group differences at a U.S. university
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100522
  5. What interpretations can we make from scores on graphic-prompt writing (GPW) tasks? An argument-based approach to test validation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100523
  6. Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES)
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524
  7. Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100525
  8. Teachers’ perspectives on the causes of rater discrepancy in an English for Academic Purposes context
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100527
  9. Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100509
  10. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100537

January 2021

  1. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100512
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(21)00006-4
  3. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college-level L2 writers’ proficiency
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100510
  4. The development and validation of an inventory on English writing teacher beliefs
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100507
  5. Syntactic complexity in L2 learners’ argumentative writing: Developmental stages and the within-genre topic effect
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100506
  6. Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
  7. Lexical density and diversity in dissertation abstracts: Revisiting English L1 vs. L2 text differences
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100511
  8. Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100505
  9. The role of L2 writing self-efficacy in integrated writing strategy use and performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100504

October 2020

  1. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(20)30060-x
  2. Designing proficiency-oriented performance tasks for the 21st-century workplace written communication: An evidence-centered design approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100487
  3. Capturing domain expert perspectives in devising a rating scale for a health specific writing test: How close can we get?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100489
  4. Using Eli review as a strategy for feedback in online courses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100486
  5. The writing that nurses do: Investigating changes to standards over time
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100491
  6. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100494
  7. Moodle quizzes and their usability for formative assessment of academic writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100485
  8. Student-centered assessment and online writing feedback: Technology in a time of crisis
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100483
  9. Comparing writing proficiency assessments used in professional medical registration: A methodology to inform policy and practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100493
  10. TOEIC® Writing test scores as indicators of the functional adequacy of writing in the international workplace: Evaluation by linguistic laypersons
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100492
  11. Assessing writing for workplace purposes: Risks, conundrums and compromises
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100484
  12. Assessing Business English writing: The development and validation of a proficiency scale
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100490
  13. ‘I will go to my grave fighting for grammar’: Exploring the ability of language-trained raters to implement a professionally-relevant rating scale for writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100488

July 2020

  1. Beyond linguistic complexity: Assessing register flexibility in EFL writing across contexts
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100465
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(20)30037-4
  3. The relationship between features of source text use and integrated writing quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100467
  4. Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
  5. Rater Negotiation Scheme: How writing raters resolve score discrepancies
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100466
  6. Changing stories: Linguistically-informed assessment of development in narrative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100471
  7. Engaging expectations: Measuring helpfulness as an alternative to student evaluations of teaching
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100464
  8. Volume 45 Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100472
  9. Presentation-mode effects in large-scale writing assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100470
  10. Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students’ attitudes and writing skills
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100468

April 2020

  1. Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
  2. eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449
  3. Assessing the metacognitive awareness relevant to L1-to-L2 rhetorical transfer in L2 writing: The cases of Chinese EFL writers across proficiency levels
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100452
  4. Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
  5. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100453
  6. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(20)30018-0

January 2020

  1. Do raters use rating scale categories consistently across analytic rubric domains in writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100416
  2. A measure of possible sources of demotivation in L2 writing: A scale development and validation study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100438