Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

April 2014

  1. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(14)00011-7
  2. Special issue on The use of rubrics to assess writing: Issues and challenges
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.002
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.003
  4. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.003
  5. Directed self-placement questionnaire design: Practices, problems, possibilities
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.006

January 2014

  1. How much feedback is enough?: Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.003
  2. Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009
  3. “Get it off my stack”: Teachers’ tools for grading papers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.005
  4. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.001
  5. Building students’ evaluative and productive expertise in the writing classroom
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.004
  6. Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004
  7. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00056-1
  8. Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008
  9. The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007

October 2013

  1. What is the role of an international journal of writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.001
  2. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.02.002
  3. A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003
  4. Show and tell: Student and instructor perceptions of screencast assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.001
  5. Everything is illuminated: What big data can tell us about teacher commentary
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.002
  6. How invariant and accurate are domain ratings in writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.002
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00039-1

July 2013

  1. Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001
  2. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.002
  3. Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
  4. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00024-x
  5. Native and non-native students’ interaction with a text-based prompt
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.001
  6. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.06.001

April 2013

  1. Thank you to reviewers, 2012
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.02.003
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00011-1
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.001
  4. How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 learners’ writing ability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.003
  5. Rater sensitivity to lexical accuracy, sophistication and range when assessing writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.02.001
  6. Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.003
  7. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.03.001
  8. Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002

January 2013

  1. Assessing Writing special issue: Assessing writing with automated scoring systems
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.002
  2. Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.005
  3. Special issue on “Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.003
  4. Automated scoring in context: Rapid assessment for placed students
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.001
  5. On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.002
  6. Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.001
  7. Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.004
  8. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(12)00055-4
  9. English language learners and automated scoring of essays: Critical considerations
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.006

October 2012

  1. Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.06.003
  2. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(12)00038-4
  3. Literacy instruction: From assignment to assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.07.001
  4. “Storming and norming”: Exploring the value of group development models in addressing conflict in communal writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.05.002
  5. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.09.001
  6. The Critical Thinking Analytic Rubric (CTAR): Investigating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.07.002