Assessing Writing

1018 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

October 2014

  1. Just Ask Teachers: Building expertise, trusting subjectivity, and valuing difference in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.06.002
  2. Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
  3. Contexts of engagement: Towards developing a model for implementing and evaluating a writing across the curriculum programme in the sciences
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.005
  4. Three current, interconnected concerns for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.003
  5. The challenges of emulating human behavior in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.07.002
  6. Examining genre effects on test takers’ summary writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.003

July 2014

  1. The three-fold benefit of reflective writing: Improving program assessment, student learning, and faculty professional development
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001
  2. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.05.002
  3. Development and validation of a scale to measure perceived authenticity in writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.001
  4. Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003
  5. Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001
  6. When “the state of the art” is counting words
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.05.001
  7. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(14)00027-0
  8. The WPA Outcomes Statement, validation, and the pursuit of localism
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.004
  9. Assembling validity evidence for assessing academic writing: Rater reactions to integrated tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.002

April 2014

  1. Measures matter: Evidence of faculty development effects on faculty and student learning
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.12.001
  2. State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001
  3. Pair assessment of pupil writing: A dialogic approach for studying the development of rater competence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.002
  4. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(14)00011-7
  5. Special issue on The use of rubrics to assess writing: Issues and challenges
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.002
  6. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.003
  7. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.003
  8. Directed self-placement questionnaire design: Practices, problems, possibilities
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.006

January 2014

  1. How much feedback is enough?: Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.003
  2. Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009
  3. “Get it off my stack”: Teachers’ tools for grading papers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.005
  4. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.001
  5. Building students’ evaluative and productive expertise in the writing classroom
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.004
  6. Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004
  7. Ed.Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00056-1
  8. Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008
  9. The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007

October 2013

  1. What is the role of an international journal of writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.001
  2. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.02.002
  3. A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003
  4. Show and tell: Student and instructor perceptions of screencast assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.001
  5. Everything is illuminated: What big data can tell us about teacher commentary
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.002
  6. How invariant and accurate are domain ratings in writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.002
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00039-1

July 2013

  1. Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001
  2. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.002
  3. Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
  4. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00024-x
  5. Native and non-native students’ interaction with a text-based prompt
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.001
  6. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.06.001

April 2013

  1. Thank you to reviewers, 2012
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.02.003
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(13)00011-1
  3. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.001
  4. How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 learners’ writing ability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.003
  5. Rater sensitivity to lexical accuracy, sophistication and range when assessing writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.02.001