Assessing Writing

1018 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

April 2013

  1. Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.003
  2. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.03.001
  3. Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002

January 2013

  1. Assessing Writing special issue: Assessing writing with automated scoring systems
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.002
  2. Validating automated essay scoring for online writing placement
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.005
  3. Special issue on “Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.003
  4. Automated scoring in context: Rapid assessment for placed students
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.001
  5. On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.002
  6. Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.001
  7. Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.004
  8. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(12)00055-4
  9. English language learners and automated scoring of essays: Critical considerations
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.006

October 2012

  1. Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.06.003
  2. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(12)00038-4
  3. Literacy instruction: From assignment to assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.07.001
  4. “Storming and norming”: Exploring the value of group development models in addressing conflict in communal writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.05.002
  5. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.09.001
  6. The Critical Thinking Analytic Rubric (CTAR): Investigating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.07.002
  7. A history of New York state literacy test assessment: Historicizing calls to localism in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.05.001

July 2012

  1. Test-taking strategies for a high-stakes writing test: An exploratory study of 12 Chinese EFL learners
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.03.001
  2. Call for book reviews
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.06.001
  3. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.06.002
  4. Using generalizability theory to examine the accuracy and validity of large-scale ESL writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.12.003
  5. Rater effects: Ego engagement in rater decision-making
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.12.001
  6. Placing data in the hands of discipline-specific decision makers: Campus-wide writing program assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.02.003
  7. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(12)00026-8

April 2012

  1. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.01.003
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(12)00010-4
  3. Challenges in assessing the development of writing ability: Theories, constructs and methods
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.02.001
  4. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.02.002
  5. The psychology of writing development—And its implications for assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.01.002
  6. Addressing the complexity of writing development: Toward an ecological model of assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.01.001

January 2012

  1. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.002
  2. Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003
  3. Validation of an ESL writing test in a Malaysian secondary school context
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.002
  4. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.001
  5. Thank you to reviewers, 2011
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.12.002
  6. A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(11)00054-7
  8. Linguistic discrimination in writing assessment: How raters react to African American “errors,” ESL errors, and standard English errors on a state-mandated writing exam
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.10.001

October 2011

  1. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.003
  2. Comparability of essay question variants
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.06.002
  3. An investigation of academic writing in secondary schools to inform the development of diagnostic classroom assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.07.001
  4. In this issue
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.001
  5. Assessing the relationship between different types of student feedback and the quality of revised writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001
  6. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(11)00039-0
  7. The accuracy of performance task scores after resolution of rater disagreement: A Monte Carlo study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.06.001

July 2011

  1. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(11)00022-5
  2. The association between SAT prompt characteristics, response features, and essay scores
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.01.001
  3. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.05.001