Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 2011

  1. Effects of computer versus paper administration of an adult functional writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.11.001

January 2010

  1. Online submission to Assessing Writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.001
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(10)00028-0
  3. Bringing reading-to-write and writing-only assessment tasks together: A generalizability analysis
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.002
  4. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.06.001
  5. Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
  6. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.03.002
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(10)00008-5
  8. Assessing Writing is going quarterly
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.09.003
  9. Situated assessment: Limitations and promise
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.03.001
  10. EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.001
  11. Playing with the stakes: A consideration of an aspect of the social context of a gatekeeping writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.06.002
  12. Publishers’ Announcement – Publication Expansion
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.10.001
  13. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.09.002
  14. Measuring the Academic Skills of University Students: Evaluation of a diagnostic procedure
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.002
  15. Ed White: Celebrating 25 Years
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.04.001
  16. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(10)00043-7
  17. Can machine scoring deal with broad and open writing tests as well as human readers?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.04.002
  18. Assessing the validity of directed self-placement at a large university
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.003
  19. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.001
  20. Assessing and providing feedback for student writing in Canadian classrooms
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.003
  21. Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004
  22. Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002

January 2009

  1. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(09)00006-3
  2. Drawing a line in the sand: Identifying the borderzone between self and other in EL1 and EL2 citation practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.01.001
  3. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(09)00033-6
  4. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.02.001
  5. Credibly assessing reading and writing abilities for both elementary student and program assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.001
  6. Looking beyond judging and ranking: Writing assessment as a generative practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.004
  7. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.05.001
  8. Classroom computer experiences that stick: Two lenses on reflective timed essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.001
  9. Finding process in product: Prewriting and revision in timed essay responses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.003
  10. The gatekeeping impulse and Professor X: An exploration
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.003
  11. Helping preservice teachers learn to assess writing: Practice and feedback in a Web-based environment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.003
  12. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.005
  13. The shifting sands in the effects of source text summarizability on summary writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.002
  14. Remembering places: Student reliance on place in timed essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.002
  15. “This test makes no freaking sense”: Criticism, confusion, and frustration in timed writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.006
  16. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(09)00020-8
  17. Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002
  18. Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.001

January 2008

  1. When a “sloppy copy” is good enough: Results of a state writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.003
  2. Dangerous liaisons: Reflections on a pilot project for state-mandated outcomes assessment of written communication
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.002
  3. Harming not helping: The impact of a Canadian standardized writing assessment on curriculum and pedagogy
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.004
  4. How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.002
  5. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00068-8
  6. Articulating a hermeneutic theory of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.005
  7. A statewide writing assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.04.001
  8. Poetry writing as expressive pedagogy in an EFL context: Identifying possible assessment tools for haiku poetry in EFL freshman college writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.001
  9. Voice in high-stakes L1 academic writing assessment: Implications for L2 writing instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.003