Assessing Writing

1000 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 2008

  1. Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment: Student choice of composing medium, raters’ perceptions, and text quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.001
  2. Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001
  3. The relationship between writers’ perceptions and their performance on a field-specific writing test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.08.002
  4. ESL students’ perceptions and experiences of standardized English writing tests
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.08.001
  5. Writing assessment: Expanding outwards and coming together
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.002
  6. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.09.001
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00034-2
  8. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00054-8
  9. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.11.001
  10. Electronic scoring of essays: Does topic matter?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.001

January 2007

  1. Rating scale impact on EFL essay marking: A mixed-method study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.001
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00027-x
  3. ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002
  4. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.11.002
  5. Warts and all: Using student portfolio outcomes to facilitate a faculty development workshop
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.002
  6. Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.001
  7. Validating placement: Local means, multiple measures
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.004
  8. Notes on Authors
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.006
  9. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00046-3
  10. Notes on Authors
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.003
  11. Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003
  12. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.005
  13. Collaborative writing assessment: Sowing seeds for transformational adult learning
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.001
  14. A reply to Peter Elbow on “Community-Based Assessment Pedagogy”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.01.001
  15. Worrying about rating
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.002
  16. Patterns of student writing in a critical thinking course: A quantitative analysis
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.001
  17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.007
  18. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.09.001
  19. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00015-9
  20. Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.001
  21. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00029-3
  22. Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.02.002
  23. Variations in portfolio assessment in higher education: Discussion of quality issues based on a Norwegian survey across institutions and disciplines
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.002
  24. Keeping assessment local: The case for accountability through formative assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.002

January 2006

  1. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.08.001
  2. Writing plan quality: Relevance to writing scores
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.01.001
  3. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00011-6
  4. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(06)00010-9
  5. Coming to know criteria: The value of an evaluating writing course for undergraduates
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.01.002
  6. Do we need a single standard of value for institutional assessment? An essay response to Asao Inoue's “community-based assessment pedagogy”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.003
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(06)00028-6
  8. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(06)00008-0
  9. The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.09.001
  10. Assessing writing in cross-curricular programs: Determining the locus of activity
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.001
  11. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.02.001
  12. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(06)00030-4
  13. Washback to the learner: Learner and teacher perspectives on IELTS preparation course expectations and outcomes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.002
  14. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00009-8
  15. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.01.001
  16. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.02.001