Assessing Writing

1018 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

January 2009

  1. The gatekeeping impulse and Professor X: An exploration
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.003
  2. Helping preservice teachers learn to assess writing: Practice and feedback in a Web-based environment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.003
  3. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.005
  4. The shifting sands in the effects of source text summarizability on summary writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.002
  5. Remembering places: Student reliance on place in timed essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.002
  6. “This test makes no freaking sense”: Criticism, confusion, and frustration in timed writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.006
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(09)00020-8
  8. Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002
  9. Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.001

January 2008

  1. When a “sloppy copy” is good enough: Results of a state writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.003
  2. Dangerous liaisons: Reflections on a pilot project for state-mandated outcomes assessment of written communication
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.002
  3. Harming not helping: The impact of a Canadian standardized writing assessment on curriculum and pedagogy
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.004
  4. How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.002
  5. Editorial Board/Aims and scope
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00068-8
  6. Articulating a hermeneutic theory of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.005
  7. A statewide writing assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.04.001
  8. Poetry writing as expressive pedagogy in an EFL context: Identifying possible assessment tools for haiku poetry in EFL freshman college writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.001
  9. Voice in high-stakes L1 academic writing assessment: Implications for L2 writing instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.003
  10. Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment: Student choice of composing medium, raters’ perceptions, and text quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.001
  11. Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001
  12. The relationship between writers’ perceptions and their performance on a field-specific writing test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.08.002
  13. ESL students’ perceptions and experiences of standardized English writing tests
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.08.001
  14. Writing assessment: Expanding outwards and coming together
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.002
  15. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.09.001
  16. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00034-2
  17. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00054-8
  18. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.11.001
  19. Electronic scoring of essays: Does topic matter?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.001

January 2007

  1. Rating scale impact on EFL essay marking: A mixed-method study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.001
  2. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00027-x
  3. ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002
  4. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.11.002
  5. Warts and all: Using student portfolio outcomes to facilitate a faculty development workshop
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.002
  6. Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.001
  7. Validating placement: Local means, multiple measures
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.004
  8. Notes on Authors
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.006
  9. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00046-3
  10. Notes on Authors
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.003
  11. Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003
  12. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.005
  13. Collaborative writing assessment: Sowing seeds for transformational adult learning
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.001
  14. A reply to Peter Elbow on “Community-Based Assessment Pedagogy”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.01.001
  15. Worrying about rating
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.002
  16. Patterns of student writing in a critical thinking course: A quantitative analysis
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.001
  17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.007
  18. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.09.001
  19. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(08)00015-9
  20. Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.001
  21. About the Authors
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(07)00029-3
  22. Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.02.002