Assessing Writing

1018 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

April 2023

  1. Genre pedagogy: A writing pedagogy to help L2 writing instructors enact their classroom writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy
    Abstract

    As part of a larger case study, this single exploratory case study aims to explore the potential of genre-based pedagogy (GBP) to allow L2 writing instructors to enact their writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy. The findings demonstrate that GBP afforded the participating writing instructor of a genre-based EAP writing course to carry out effective writing classroom assessment practices and thus enact their2 writing assessment literacy and feedback literacy. GBP allowed effective writing classroom assessment practices such as diagnostic assessment and learner involvement in assessment. More specifically, genre exploration tasks led to diagnostic assessment and helped the instructor coordinate effective classroom discussions to elicit evidence of the students’ knowledge of the target genre that they would study. Second, students’ production of texts in target genres not only allowed the instructor to collect evidence of the students’ specific genre knowledge, but it also afforded learner involvement through self-reflection. The instructor could also efficiently interpret this evidence and provide formative feedback through pre-established genre specific assessment criteria.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100717
  2. Developing and evaluating a set of process and product-oriented classroom assessment rubrics for assessing digital multimodal collaborative writing in L2 classes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100723
  3. Experienced but detached from reality: Theorizing and operationalizing the relationship between experience and rater effects
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100713
  4. Constructing and validating a self-assessment scale for Chinese college English-major students’ feedback knowledge repertoire in EFL academic writing: Item response theory and factor analysis approaches
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100716
  5. Linguistic complexity as the predictor of EFL independent and integrated writing quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100727
  6. The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated by feedback acceptance: The effect on undergraduate students’ writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100725

January 2023

  1. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(23)00012-0
  2. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100695
  3. Editorial - vol 55 Jan 2023
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100700
  4. Tasks and feedback: An exploration of students’ opportunity to develop adaptive expertise for analytic text-based writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100689
  5. Teaching second-grade students to write science expository text: Does a holistic or analytic rubric provide more meaningful results?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100676
  6. A multidimensional approach to assessing the effects of task complexity on L2 students’ argumentative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100690
  7. Book Review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100696
  8. Assessing the writing quality of English research articles based on absolute and relative measures of syntactic complexity
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100692
  9. Exploring the development of student feedback literacy in the second language writing classroom
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100697
  10. The impacts of self-efficacy on undergraduate students’ perceived task value and task performance of L1 Chinese integrated writing: A mixed-method research
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100687
  11. Comparing summative and dynamic assessments of L2 written argumentative discourse: Microgenetic validity evidence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100691
  12. Visual thinking and argumentative writing: A social-cognitive pairing for student writing development
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100694
  13. A multi-measure approach for lexical diversity in writing assessments: Considerations in measurement and timing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100688
  14. Examining the reliability of an international Chinese proficiency standardized writing assessment: Implications for assessment policy makers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100693

October 2022

  1. The persuasive essays for rating, selecting, and understanding argumentative and discourse elements (PERSUADE) corpus 1.0
    Abstract

    This paper introduces the Persuasive Essays for Rating, Selecting, and Understanding Argumentative and Discourse Elements (PERSUADE) corpus.The PERSUADE corpus is large-scale corpus of writing with annotated discourse elements. The goal of the corpus is to spur the development of new, open-source scoring algorithms that identify discourse elements in argumentative writing to open new avenues for the development of automatic writing evaluation systems that focus more specifically on the semantic and organizational elements of student writing.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100667
  2. Using unfolding models to identify targeted feedback strategies for student writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100670
  3. Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing from sources: Self-efficacy and performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100663
  4. Editorial Volume 54
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100677
  5. Assessing pragmatic performance in advanced L2 academic writing through the lens of local grammars: A case study of ‘exemplification’
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100668
  6. Validity evidences for scoring procedures of a writing assessment task. A case study on consistency, reliability, unidimensionality and prediction accuracy
    Abstract

    Scoring is a fundamental step in the assessment of writing performance. The choice of the scoring procedure as well as the adoption of a discrepancy resolution method can impact the psychometric properties of the scores and therefore the final pass/fail decision. In a comprehensive framework which considers scoring as part of the validation process of the scores, the aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of rater mean, parity and tertium quid procedures on score properties. Using data from a writing assessment task applied in a professional context, the paper analyses score reliability, dependability, unidimensionality and decision accuracy on two sets of data; complete data and subsample of discrepant data. The results show better performance of the tertium quid procedure in terms of reliability indicators but a lower quality in defining construct unidimensionality.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100669
  7. Assessing L2 integrated writing self-efficacy: Development and validation of a scale
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100665
  8. Transfer of ideal L1 and L2 writing selves and their impacts on L2 writing enjoyment and integrated writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100674
  9. Examining evaluative language used in assessment feedback on business students’ academic writing
    Abstract

    Written assessment feedback in higher education has been examined from different perspectives. However, there is limited empirical evidence of how tutors use language to provide assessment feedback on students’ assessed academic writing. By deploying the rarely used Appraisal framework in Systemic Functional Linguistics, this innovative study examined the use of evaluative language by tutors in feedback on undergraduate business students’ academic writing in two assignments at a distance university. The data consisted of 16 tutor assessment feedback summaries on eight students’ written assignments and interviews with those students. The Appraisal system of Attitude (Judgement, Appreciation and Affect) was used to analyse the evaluative language of the summaries. The analysis of student interviews provided insights into their perceptions of tutor feedback, complementing the linguistic analysis. The findings suggest that tutors’ evaluative language was primarily used to judge students rather than to appreciate the assignment, and show their emotional reactions, potentially owing to the distance learning context. Additionally, while most of the feedback was perceived positively, students found certain types of tutor feedback less helpful. The paper has implications for moving assessment feedback research forward through applying the Appraisal framework, improving assessment strategies and tutor formative feedback practices in writing assessment.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100664
  10. Structure and coherence as challenges in composition: A study of assessing less proficient EFL writers’ text quality
    Abstract

    Students are usually expected to write full texts in English as a foreign language (EFL) at the end of secondary education. However, research on EFL writing at school is scarce, especially regarding less proficient writers, and seldom focuses on deep-level text features such as structure and coherence. Based on a sample of 166 EFL students in Year 9 attending German middle and lower performance track schools, this study examined 326 narrative and argumentative texts. First, we assessed structure and coherence via analytic ratings using detailed rubrics to gain insights into possible challenges for students. Our analysis showed that relevant text parts (such as the conclusion) were mostly missing and that students struggled to establish a broad common thread with argumentative texts being overall less structured and coherent than narrative texts. Second, we used the software Comproved® to conduct holistic ratings of overall text quality and compared them with our analytic ratings. Large correlations between both ratings suggest that structure and coherence are important aspects of text quality. We discuss how our rubrics can serve as a useful tool for assessment for learning and assist less proficient writers in establishing deep-level features in their texts.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100672
  11. Integrated writing and its correlates: A meta-analysis
    Abstract

    Integrated tasks are increasing in popularity, either replacing or complementing writing-only independent tasks in writing assessments. This shift has generated many research interests to investigate the underlying construct and features of integrated writing (IW) performances. However, due to the complexity of the IW construct, there are conflicting findings about whether and the extent to which various language skills and IW text features correlate to IW scores. To understand the construct of IW, we conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize correlation coefficients between scores of IW performances and (1) other language skills and (2) text quality features of IW. We also examined factors that may moderate the correlation of IW scores with these two groups of correlates. Consequently, (1) reading and writing skills showed stronger correlations than listening to IW scores; and (2) text length had a strongest correlation, followed by source integration, organization and syntactic complexity, with a smallest correlation of lexical complexity. Several IW task features affected the magnitude of correlations. The results supported the view that IW is an independent construct, albeit related, from other language skills and IW task features may affect the construct of IW.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100662
  12. Constructs of argumentative writing in assessment tools
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100675
  13. Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
  14. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(22)00078-2
  15. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 writing across proficiency levels: A matter of L1 background?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100673
  16. (In)Equities in directed self-placement
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100671

July 2022

  1. Book review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100627
  2. How feedback conditions broaden or constrain knowledge and perceptions about improvement in L2 writing: A 12-week exploratory study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100633
  3. Diversity of Advanced Sentence Structures (DASS) in writing predicts argumentative writing quality and receptive academic language skills of fifth-to-eighth grade students
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100649
  4. Editorial
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100652
  5. Unpacking the contribution of linguistic features to graph writing quality: An analytic scoring approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100644
  6. Investigating whether a flemma count is a more distinctive measurement of lexical diversity
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100640
  7. Editorial Board
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(22)00053-8
  8. Developing and validating an analytic rating scale for a paraphrase task
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100646
  9. Reconceptualizing the impact of feedback in second language writing: A multidimensional perspective
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630
  10. Perceptions of authorial voice: Why discrepancies exist
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100632
  11. Liz Hamp Lyons: A life in Writing Assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100651
  12. Explicit strategy-based instruction in L2 writing contexts: A perspective of self-regulated learning and formative assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100645
  13. It takes two to tango: Investigating teacher-student interactions related to written corrective feedback with Activity Theory
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100647
  14. Diagnosing EFL undergraduates’ discourse competence in academic writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100641