Abstract

Abstract We justify and describe our development of the Service Learning Opportunities in Technical Communication (SLOT-C) Database. The database broadens the range of organizations that instructors and students have for client-based communication projects. We argue in support of incorporating service learning into classes and facilitating partnerships among university instructors, their students, and nonprofits. We report strategies we learned for working with student interns and IT experts and strategies we developed as we worked with usability-test participants. Keywords: client-based communication projectsiterative designservice learning opportunitiestechnical communicationuser-centered design ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We sincerely thank the Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication for awarding us a research grant in 2009 to build this database. We greatly appreciate Sam Singer, whose expertise in databases and Web development made the concept become a reality. We would also like to thank Stewart Whittemore, who contributed ideas in the early planning stage. Notes Waterfall design involves creating a design to which you are firmly committed early in development and letting all design decisions flow from the initial plan. Iterative design is more flexible, allowing the plan to change as needed in response to feedback. Additional informationNotes on contributorsSusan A. Youngblood Susan A. Youngblood teaches technical and professional communication at Auburn University, and many of her classes feature service learning. Her research addresses vulnerability, accessibility, and competing needs in communication, particularly in online environments. Jo Mackiewicz Jo Mackiewicz teaches editing at Auburn University. Her research applies linguistics to technical communication and focuses on politeness and credibility in evaluative texts such as tutoring interactions, editing sessions, and online reviews.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2013-07-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2013.775542
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/1080569910376534
  2. 10.1207/215427625tcq1002_4
  3. 10.1177/0092055X0903700201
  4. 10.1177/1080569909357614
  5. 10.1177/108056990606900207
  6. 10.1287/orsc.1080.0357
  7. 10.1080/08832320209599063
  8. 10.1080/00335630.2010.521176
  9. 10.1177/108056990606900208
  10. 10.1177/1080569904273709
  11. 10.1080/00986280708336644
  12. 10.1080/08824090701304881
  13. 10.1177/0273475309334169
  14. 10.1002/nml.6
  15. 10.1002/j.2379-3988.1999.tb00039.x
    Social Policy Report  
  16. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2041387
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network →