Assessing Writing
31 articles
Search
Year:
From…
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
–
To…
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
1968
1967
1966
1965
1964
1963
1962
1961
1960
1959
1958
1957
1956
1955
1954
1953
1952
1951
1950
1949
1948
1947
1946
1945
1944
1943
1942
1941
1940
1939
Topic:
All topics…
multilingual writers (198)
assessment (128)
multimodality (49)
revision (31)
artificial intelligence (21)
affect and writing (14)
qualitative research (14)
voice and style (13)
writing program administration (8)
empirical research (7)
genre theory (7)
online writing instruction (7)
writing pedagogy (6)
writing across the curriculum (5)
graduate education (4)
rhetorical theory (3)
race and writing (2)
scientific writing (2)
technical communication (2)
translingualism (2)
argument (1)
literacy studies (1)
quantitative research (1)
writing centers (1)
Apply
Clear
Export:
BibTeX
RIS
revision
×
April 2026
Apr 2026
An ecological approach to L2 learners’ engagement with written feedback
↗
Zaibo Long; Jinfen Xu
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101028
Apr 2026
L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing
↗
Xinyu Ma; Cong Zhang; Icy Lee
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101020
July 2025
Jul 2025
Promoting cognitive engagement with peer feedback through peer review training: The case of Chinese tertiary-level EFL learners
↗
Jia He; Jun Xia; Chun-mei Zhang; Jian-nan Liu
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100947
Jul 2025
The impact of self-revision, machine translation, and ChatGPT on L2 writing: Raters’ assessments, linguistic complexity, and error correction
↗
Minjoo Kim; Yuah V. Chon
artificial intelligence
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100950
Jul 2025
A mixed-methods approach to English-L1 teachers’ implementation of written feedback in EFL classrooms
↗
Xiaolong Cheng; Jinfen Xu
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100935
January 2025
Jan 2025
Examining EFL learners’ quantity and quality of uptake of teacher corrective feedback on writing across three different editing settings
↗
Saleh Mosleh Alharthi
genre theory
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100911
October 2024
Oct 2024
L2 master’s and doctoral students’ preferences for supervisor written feedback on their theses/dissertations
↗
MohammadHamed Hoomanfard
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100891
April 2024
Apr 2024
Comparing trained EFL peer reviewers’ feedback: From claim to reality
↗
Alireza Memari Hanjani
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100836
January 2024
Jan 2024
Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer review and revision in writing-to-learn
↗
Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Field M. Watts; Ginger V. Shultz
qualitative research
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808
July 2023
Jul 2023
The development of teacher feedback literacy in situ: EFL writing teachers’ endeavor to human-computer-AWE integral feedback innovation
↗
Peisha Wu; Shulin Yu; Yanqi Luo
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739
Jul 2023
The development and validation of a scale on L2 writing teacher feedback literacy
↗
Icy Lee; Mehmet Karaca; Serhat Inan
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100743
April 2023
Apr 2023
Developing teacher feedback literacy through self-study: Exploring written commentary in a critical language writing curriculum
↗
Emma R. Britton
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100709
Apr 2023
Feedback on writing through the lens of activity theory: An exploration of changes to peer-to-peer interactions
↗
Nicholas Carr
genre theory
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100720
Apr 2023
The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated by feedback acceptance: The effect on undergraduate students’ writing performance
↗
Qi Lu; Yuan Yao; Xinhua Zhu
graduate education
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100725
April 2022
Apr 2022
The mediating effects of student beliefs on engagement with written feedback in preparation for high-stakes English writing assessment
↗
William S. Pearson
assessment
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100611
Apr 2022
Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision?
↗
Kathryn S. McCarthy; Rod D. Roscoe; Laura K. Allen; Aaron D. Likens; Danielle S. McNamara
artificial intelligence
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100608
Apr 2022
Exploring the impact of teacher feedback modes and features on students' text revisions in writing
↗
Mohammed Abdullah Alharbi
multimodality
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100610
October 2021
Oct 2021
Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision
↗
Syed Muhammad Mujtaba; Barry Lee Reynolds; Rakesh Parkash; Manjet Kaur Mehar Singh
multilingual writers
revision
affect and writing
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566
July 2021
Jul 2021
Insights into the cognitive processes of trained vs untrained EFL peer reviewers on writing: An exploratory study
↗
Alireza Memari Hanjani
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100530
April 2020
Apr 2020
eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
↗
Elaine Lin Wang; Lindsay Clare Matsumura; Richard Correnti; Diane Litman; Haoran Zhang; Emily Howe; Ahmed Magooda; Rafael Quintana
artificial intelligence
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449
January 2020
Jan 2020
Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions
↗
Zhe (Victor) Zhang
artificial intelligence
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439
April 2019
Apr 2019
Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing
↗
Jing Chen; Lawrence Jun Zhang
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.002
July 2017
Jul 2017
Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
↗
Ian G. Anson; Chris M. Anson
quantitative research
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001
January 2017
Jan 2017
“I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback
↗
Omer Hassan Ali Mahfoodh
multilingual writers
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001
October 2015
Oct 2015
Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
↗
Gerriet Janssen; Valerie Meier; Jonathan Trace
assessment
empirical research
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002
July 2015
Jul 2015
Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
↗
Carrie Yea-huey Chang
multimodality
multilingual writers
revision
affect and writing
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001
October 2012
Oct 2012
Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach
↗
Claudia Harsch; Guido Martin
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.06.003
January 2010
Jan 2010
Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom
↗
Huahui Zhao
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
January 2009
Jan 2009
Finding process in product: Prewriting and revision in timed essay responses
↗
Dorothy L. Worden
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.003
January 2004
Jan 2004
Written feedback and scoring of sixth-grade girls’ and boys’ narrative and persuasive writing
↗
Shelley Peterson; Ruth Childs; Kerrie Kennedy
revision
doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.002
January 1998
Jan 1998
Learning from research in assessment: A response to writing assessment—raters' elaboration of the rating task
↗
Harry Torrance
assessment
revision
doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80004-x