Assessing Writing

31 articles
Year: Topic: Clear
Export:
revision ×

April 2026

  1. An ecological approach to L2 learners’ engagement with written feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101028
  2. L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101020

July 2025

  1. Promoting cognitive engagement with peer feedback through peer review training: The case of Chinese tertiary-level EFL learners
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100947
  2. The impact of self-revision, machine translation, and ChatGPT on L2 writing: Raters’ assessments, linguistic complexity, and error correction
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100950
  3. A mixed-methods approach to English-L1 teachers’ implementation of written feedback in EFL classrooms
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100935

January 2025

  1. Examining EFL learners’ quantity and quality of uptake of teacher corrective feedback on writing across three different editing settings
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100911

October 2024

  1. L2 master’s and doctoral students’ preferences for supervisor written feedback on their theses/dissertations
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100891

April 2024

  1. Comparing trained EFL peer reviewers’ feedback: From claim to reality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100836

January 2024

  1. Reading, receiving, revising: A case study on the relationship between peer review and revision in writing-to-learn
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808

July 2023

  1. The development of teacher feedback literacy in situ: EFL writing teachers’ endeavor to human-computer-AWE integral feedback innovation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739
  2. The development and validation of a scale on L2 writing teacher feedback literacy
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100743

April 2023

  1. Developing teacher feedback literacy through self-study: Exploring written commentary in a critical language writing curriculum
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100709
  2. Feedback on writing through the lens of activity theory: An exploration of changes to peer-to-peer interactions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100720
  3. The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated by feedback acceptance: The effect on undergraduate students’ writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100725

April 2022

  1. The mediating effects of student beliefs on engagement with written feedback in preparation for high-stakes English writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100611
  2. Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback support high-quality writing and revision?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100608
  3. Exploring the impact of teacher feedback modes and features on students' text revisions in writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100610

October 2021

  1. Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566

July 2021

  1. Insights into the cognitive processes of trained vs untrained EFL peer reviewers on writing: An exploratory study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100530

April 2020

  1. eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449

January 2020

  1. Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439

April 2019

  1. Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision in EFL writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.002

July 2017

  1. Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis from an expert survey
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.001

January 2017

  1. “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001

October 2015

  1. Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002

July 2015

  1. Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001

October 2012

  1. Adapting CEF-descriptors for rating purposes: Validation by a combined rater training and scale revision approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.06.003

January 2010

  1. Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002

January 2009

  1. Finding process in product: Prewriting and revision in timed essay responses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.003

January 2004

  1. Written feedback and scoring of sixth-grade girls’ and boys’ narrative and persuasive writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.002

January 1998

  1. Learning from research in assessment: A response to writing assessment—raters' elaboration of the rating task
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)80004-x